The anthropocentric paradigm and the posibility of animal ethics

Ethics and the Environment 15 (1):pp. 27-50 (2010)
Animal ethics has presented various 'pro-animal arguments' according to which non-human animals have a more significant moral status than traditionally assumed. Although these arguments (brought forward, for instance, by Peter Singer, Tom Regan, Mary Midgley, Stephen Clark, and Mark Rowlands) have been met with various forms of criticism, a quick overview of animal ethics literature suggests that they are difficult to overcome. Pro-animal arguments seem to have consistency and argumentative support on their side. However, recently a new type of criticism has become more prominent. The claim is that the pro-animal arguments ignore the relevance of established paradigms and meanings. The moral status of animals is ..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2979/ETE.2010.15.1.27
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,280
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
John Hadley (2013). Liberty and Valuing Sentient Life. Ethics and the Environment 18 (1):87-103.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

175 ( #23,007 of 1,932,539 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #94,309 of 1,932,539 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.