|Abstract||We propose using random walks in software space as abstract formal models of biological evolution. The goal is to shed light on biological creativity using toy models of evolution that are simple enough to prove theorems about them. We consider two models: a single mutating piece of software, and a population of mutating software. The fitness function is taken from a well known problem in computability theory that requires an unlimited amount of creativity, the Busy Beaver problem. (Talk given Friday October 10, 2008 at the IBM Watson Research Center in Yorktown Heights, NY. The author wishes to thank his colleagues Charles Bennett and David DiVincenzo for their helpful comments.).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Samir Chopra & Scott Dexter (2009). The Freedoms of Software and its Ethical Uses. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4).
Ralph Gregory Taylor (1998). Models of Computation and Formal Languages. Oxford University Press.
Don Gotterbarn (1999). Not All Codes Are Created Equal: The Software Engineering Code of Ethics, a Success Story. Journal of Business Ethics 22 (1):81 - 89.
Peter Suber (1988). What is Software? Journal of Speculative Philosophy 2 (2):89-119.
Richard S. Glass & Wallace A. Wood (1996). Situational Determinants of Software Piracy: An Equity Theory Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11):1189 - 1198.
S. Chopra & S. Dexter (2011). Free Software and the Economics of Information Justice. Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):173-184.
Nurbay Irmak (forthcoming). Software is an Abstract Artifact. Grazer Philosophische Studien.
Ronald R. Sims, Hsing K. Cheng & Hildy Teegen (1996). Toward a Profile of Student Software Piraters. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (8):839 - 849.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #99,484 of 549,060 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,060 )
How can I increase my downloads?