“Minding our business”: What the united states government has done and can do to ensure that U.s. Multinationals act responsibly in foreign markets [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 59 (1-2):175 - 198 (2005)
|Abstract||The United States Government does not mandate that US based firms follow US social and environmental law in foreign markets. However, because many developing countries do not have strong human rights, labor, and environmental laws, many multinationals have adopted voluntary corporate responsibility initiatives to self-regulate their overseas social and environmental practices. This article argues that voluntary actions, while important, are insufficient to address the magnitude of problems companies confront as they operate in developing countries where governance is often inadequate. The United States can do more to ensure that its multinationals act responsibly everywhere they operate. First, policymakers should define the social and environmental responsibilities of global companies. They must consistently make their expectations for global business clear – and underscore that this objective can often be accomplished without mandates. Second, the US should closely examine the policies that undermine global Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and address the many conflicting signals sent by policymakers. Third, the President should make the US government a CSR model by examining how to use its purchasing power to promote human rights. Finally, the US government should require pension funds to report on the social and environmental consequences of their investments. In these ways, Americans can mind our business – and thus make sure that US based firms do not undermine social and environmental progress when they operate in the developing world|
|Keywords||Economic foreign global corporate social responsibility human rights labor standards public policies sustainability development trade|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
William Beaver (1994). Nuclear Nightmares in the Philippines. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (4):271 - 279.
Eng Tuck Cheah, Wen Li Chan & Corinne Lin Lin Chieng (2007). The Corporate Social Responsibility of Pharmaceutical Product Recalls: An Empirical Examination of U.S. And U.K. Markets. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 76 (4):427 - 449.
David Antony Detomasi (2007). The Multinational Corporation and Global Governance: Modelling Global Public Policy Networks. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 71 (3):321 - 334.
Şükrü Özen & Fatma Küskü (2009). Corporate Environmental Citizenship Variation in Developing Countries: An Institutional Framework. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (2):297 - 313.
Natalia Yakovleva & Diego Vazquez-Brust (2012). Stakeholder Perspectives on CSR of Mining MNCs in Argentina. Journal of Business Ethics 106 (2):191-211.
Alan Muller & Ans Kolk (2009). CSR Performance in Emerging Markets Evidence From Mexico. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2):325 - 337.
Asolo Adeyeye Adewole (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility, Self-Regulation, and the Problems of Unethical Business Practices in Africa. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:69-79.
Asolo Adeyeye Adewole (unknown). Corporate Social Responsibility, Self-Regulation, and the Problems of Unethical Business Practices in Africa: A Case for the Establishment of a United Nations Global Business Regulatory Agency. :69-79.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #86,055 of 739,575 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,575 )
How can I increase my downloads?