Graduate studies at Western
Nursing Ethics 19 (3):419-430 (2012)
|Abstract||The aim of this study is to explore how nurses perceive patient participations of patients over 75 years old undergoing hemodialysis treatment in dialysis units, and of their next of kin. Ten nurses told stories about what happened in the dialysis units. These stories were analyzed with critical discourse analysis. Three discursive practices are found: (1) the nurses’ power and control; (2) sharing power with the patient; and (3) transferring power to the next of kin. The first and the predominant discursive practice can be explained with an ideology of paternalism, in which the nurses used biomedical explanations and the ethical principle of benefice to justify their actions. The second can be explained with an ideology of participation, in which the nurses used ethical narratives as a way to let the patients participate in the treatment. The third seemed to involve autonomous decision-making and the ethical principle of autonomy for the next of kin in the difficult end-of-life decisions|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Timothy D. Rawlins & John G. Bradley (1990). Planning for Hospital Ethics Committees: Meeting the Needs of the Professional Staff. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 2 (6):361-374.
Kirsten Schou, Herdis Alvsvåg, Gunnhild Blåka & Eva Gjengedal (2008). The (Dis)Appearance of the Dying Patient in Generalist Hospital and Care Home Nurses' Talk About the Patient. Nursing Philosophy 9 (4):233-247.
David Orentlicher (2005). Making Research a Requirement of Treatment: Why We Should Sometimes Let Doctors Pressure Patients to Participate in Research. Hastings Center Report 35 (5):20-28.
Stefano Tomelleri (2012). The Doctor, the Patient, and the Metaphor. World Futures 68 (3):206 - 211.
Edmund L. Erde (1999). Informed Consent to Septoplasty: An Anecdote From the Field. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1):11 – 17.
Nanon Labrie (2012). Strategic Maneuvering in Treatment Decision-Making Discussions: Two Cases in Point. [REVIEW] Argumentation 26 (2):171-199.
J. Schildmann, M. Grunke, J. R. Kalden & J. Vollmann (2008). Information and Participation in Decision-Making About Treatment: A Qualitative Study of the Perceptions and Preferences of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):775-779.
Els Bryon, Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé & Chris Gastmans (2011). 'Because We See Them Naked' – Nurses' Experiences in Caring for Hospitalized Patients with Dementia: Considering Artificial Nutrition or Hydration (Anh). Bioethics 26 (6):285-295.
David B. Resnik (2005). The Patient's Duty to Adhere to Prescribed Treatment: An Ethical Analysis. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):167 – 188.
Kate Jones (2006). Strengthening Professional Practice. Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (1):4.
Matthew C. Lally & Scott A. Freeman (2005). Perspectives: The Struggle to Maintain Neutrality in the Treatment of a Patient with Pedophilia. Ethics and Behavior 15 (2):181 – 190.
Franklin G. Miller (1993). The Concept of Medically Indicated Treatment. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):91-98.
Richard T. Hull (1985). Informed Consent: Patient's Right or Patient's Duty? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):183-198.
Douglas O. Stewart & Joseph P. DeMarco (2005). An Economic Theory of Patient Decision-Making. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (3):153-164.
Helga Kuhse (1997). Caring: Nurses, Women, and Ethics. Blackwell Publishers.
Added to index2012-02-10
Total downloads7 ( #142,473 of 740,210 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 740,210 )
How can I increase my downloads?