Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (4):50-73 (1999)
|Abstract||One of the major purposes of this article is to show that friendship was one of Nietzsche's central concerns and that he shared Aristotle's belief that it takes higher and lower forms. Yet Nietzsche's interest in friendship is overlooked in much of the secondary literature. An important reason for this is that this interest is most evident in the works of his middle period, and these tend to be neglected in commentaries on Nietzsche. In the works of the middle period, Nietzsche suggests that there is a close connection between friendship and selfhood, contending that an individual's friendships reflect something about his or her identity. Following Aristotle, he believes that friendship can make a significant contribution to self-knowledge and self-improvement, which are both closely associated with his notion of self-overcoming. Nietzsche encourages individuals to adopt an aesthetic approach to the self: they should refashion themselves by consolidating their strengths, minimising their weaknesses and developing themselves in new directions. The works of the middle period suggest, however, that not only can friendship foster self-overcoming, but that the talent for friendship is one of the marks of a higher human being. Recognising this requires some reconsideration of Nietzsche's putative individualism and the belief that he holds great individuals to be utterly independent and indifferent to the judgements of others. It also requires a revision of the common interpretation that he is unremittingly sceptical about pity and other forms of fellow-feeling. Yet while Nietzsche generalises about friendship in the works of the middle period and contrasts its superior and inferior forms, he remains sensitive to its particularity. He never adopts a wholly formulaic approach to this relationship, but recognises that difference and responsiveness to particularity are among its central characteristics.|
|Keywords||Nietzsche friendship Aristotle middle period Human, All too Human Daybreak Gay Science|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ruth Abbey (2000). Nietzsche's Middle Period. Oxford University Press.
Robert C. Miner (forthcoming). Nietzsche on Friendship. Journal of Nietzsche Studies.
Ruth Abbey (1996). Beyond Misogyny and Metaphor: Women in Nietzsche's Middle Period. Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (2):233-256.
Ruth Abbey (forthcoming). Nietzsche and the Invention of Invention. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 15 (Spring):1-14.
Ruth Abbey (1999). The Roots of Ressentiment. New Nietzsche Studies 3 (3-4):47-61.
Mark Vernon (2005). The Philosophy of Friendship. Palgrave Macmillan.
Steve Garlick (2002). The Beauty of Friendship: Foucault, Masculinity and the Work of Art. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (5):558-577.
Holger Zaborowski (2010). From Modesty to Dynamite, From Socrates to Dionysus. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (2):337-356.
Paul Franco (2011). Nietzsche's Enlightenment: The Free-Spirit Trilogy of the Middle Period. University of Chicago Press.
Joyce L. Jenkins (1999). The Advantages of Civic Friendship. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:459-471.
R. K. Bentley (2013). Civic Friendship and Thin Citizenship. Res Publica 19 (1):5-19.
Barbro Fröding & Martin Peterson (2012). Why Virtual Friendship is No Genuine Friendship. Ethics and Information Technology 14 (3):201-207.
Paul Crittenden (2002). Nietzsche's Middle Period. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (3):390 – 392.
Dirk Baltzly & Nick Eliopoulos (2009). The Classical Ideals of Friendship. In Barabara Caine (ed.), Friendship: a history,. Equinox.
Wanda Cizewski (1992). Friendship With God? Philosophy and Theology 6 (4):369-381.
Added to index2011-10-19
Total downloads11 ( #99,573 of 549,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?