Graduate studies at Western
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (4):413-435 (2008)
|Abstract||Abstract: Contrary to received opinion, Descartes' view on the merits of the ontological proof may actually agree with that of Thomas Aquinas, whose rejection of the a priori existence proof has stocked the armories of anti-Anselmians ever since. In a rarely noted passage of the First Replies, Descartes claims not to differ in any respect from Thomas on the proof, a claim that gains sense in light of recent work on the Fifth Meditation. That work in turn reveals a well-founded, if surprising, understanding of the Cartesian proof and of Cartesianism's true relation to Thomism.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Georges Dicker (1993). Descartes: An Analytical and Historical Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Carson Mark (1975). Descartes Proof in Meditation III. International Studies in Philosophy 7:69-88.
Robert C. Miner (2002). The Dependence of Descartes' Ontological Proof: Upon the Doctrine of Causa Sui. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 58 (4):873 - 886.
S. K. Wertz (1990). Why is the Ontological Proof in Descartes' Flfth Meditation? Southwest Philosophy Review 6 (2):107-109.
Samuel C. Rickless (2005). The Cartesian Fallacy Fallacy. Noûs 39 (2):309–336.
John Edward Abbruzzese (2007). The Structure of Descartes's Ontological Proof. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2):253 – 282.
M. V. Dougherty (2002). The Importance of Cartesian Triangles: A New Look at Descartes's Ontological Argument. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):35 – 62.
Cecilia Wee (2012). Descartes's Ontological Proof of God's Existence. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):23 - 40.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads93 ( #9,109 of 739,697 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,697 )
How can I increase my downloads?