No Life is Bare, the Ordinary is Exceptional: Giorgio Agamben and the Question of Political Ontology
Parrhesia 14:23-36 (2012)
|Abstract||In this article I develop a theory of political ontology, working to differentiate it from traditional political philosophy and Schmittian political theology. As with political theology, political ontology has its primary grounding not in disinterested contemplation from the standpoint of pure reason, but rather in a confrontation with an existential problem. Yet while for Schmitt this is the problem of how to live and think in obedience to God, the problem for political ontology is the question of being. Thus the political ontologist agrees with the political theologian that the political cannot be thought without an awareness of an irreducible exigency – the fact that one thinks as situated in response to a certain moral or ethical demand – but it takes this demand to consist not in divine revelation, but rather in the fact that the human being is a being for which being is at issue. With this definition in mind I go on to read Giorgio Agamben in resolutely ontological terms, arguing that his concepts of bare life and the exception are largely unintelligible if understood ontically. Instead, these concepts are part of a critique that has as its primary target not the ontic political systems and material institutions of modern states but rather the (negative) metaphysical ground of those systems. Political ontology insists on the intertwining of ontology and politics, claiming that theirs is a relation of mutual determination.|
|Keywords||Giorgio Agamben Martin Heidegger Carl Schmitt political ontology bare life the exception Homo Sacer|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Omar Rivera (2011). Political Ontology (and Representative Politics), Agamben, Dussel . . . Subcomandante Marcos. Epoché 16 (1):125-138.
Andrew Norris (2005). The Exemplary Exception: Philosophical and Political Decisions in Giorgio Agamben's Homo Sacer. In Andrew Norris (ed.), Politics, Metaphysics, and Death: Essays on Giorgio Agamben's Homo Sacer. Duke University Press.
Matthew Calarco & Steven DeCaroli (eds.) (2007). Giorgio Agamben: Sovereignty and Life. Stanford University Press.
Christopher A. Fox (2007). Sacrificial Pasts and Messianic Futures: Religion as a Political Prospect in René Girard and Giorgio Agamben. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (5):563-595.
Paul A. Passavant (2007). The Contradictory State of Giorgio Agamben. Political Theory 35 (2):147 - 174.
Giorgio Agamben (2005). The State of Exception. In Andrew Norris (ed.), Politics, Metaphysics, and Death: Essays on Giorgio Agamben's Homo Sacer. Duke University Press.
Sergei Prozorov (2009). The Appropriation of Abandonment: Giorgio Agamben on the State of Nature and the Political. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (3):327-353.
S. Prozorov (2010). Why Giorgio Agamben is an Optimist. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (9):1053-1073.
Peter Fitzpatrick (2005). Bare Sovereignty: Homo Sacer and the Insistence of Law. In Andrew Norris (ed.), Politics, Metaphysics, and Death: Essays on Giorgio Agamben's Homo Sacer. Duke University Press.
Colby Dickinson (2011). Beyond Violence, Beyond the Text: The Role of Gesture in Walter Benjamin and Giorgio Agamben, and its Affinity with the Work of René Girard. Heythrop Journal 52 (6):952-961.
Sergei Prozorov (2012). The Katechon in the Age of Biopolitical Nihilism. Continental Philosophy Review 45 (4):483-503.
Paul Livingston (2009). Agamben, Badiou, and Russell. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (3):297-325.
Johanna Oksala (2012). Foucault, Politics, and Violence. Northwestern University Press.
Added to index2012-08-02
Total downloads29 ( #43,142 of 556,888 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,653 of 556,888 )
How can I increase my downloads?