No Life is Bare, the Ordinary is Exceptional: Giorgio Agamben and the Question of Political Ontology

Parrhesia 14:23-36 (2012)
Abstract
In this article I develop a theory of political ontology, working to differentiate it from traditional political philosophy and Schmittian political theology. As with political theology, political ontology has its primary grounding not in disinterested contemplation from the standpoint of pure reason, but rather in a confrontation with an existential problem. Yet while for Schmitt this is the problem of how to live and think in obedience to God, the problem for political ontology is the question of being. Thus the political ontologist agrees with the political theologian that the political cannot be thought without an awareness of an irreducible exigency – the fact that one thinks as situated in response to a certain moral or ethical demand – but it takes this demand to consist not in divine revelation, but rather in the fact that the human being is a being for which being is at issue. With this definition in mind I go on to read Giorgio Agamben in resolutely ontological terms, arguing that his concepts of bare life and the exception are largely unintelligible if understood ontically. Instead, these concepts are part of a critique that has as its primary target not the ontic political systems and material institutions of modern states but rather the (negative) metaphysical ground of those systems. Political ontology insists on the intertwining of ontology and politics, claiming that theirs is a relation of mutual determination.
Keywords Giorgio Agamben  Martin Heidegger  Carl Schmitt  political ontology  bare life  the exception  Homo Sacer
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    S. Prozorov (2010). Why Giorgio Agamben is an Optimist. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (9):1053-1073.
    Paul Livingston (2009). Agamben, Badiou, and Russell. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (3):297-325.
    Paul M. Livingston (2009). Agamben, Badiou, and Russell. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (3):297-325.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-08-02

    Total downloads

    23 ( #63,373 of 1,088,782 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #42,743 of 1,088,782 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.