Sight and Touch: An Attempt to Disprove the Received (or Berkeleian) Theory of Vision
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$13.75 new (40% off) $18.20 direct from Amazon (20% off) $22.70 used (1% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B1349.P4.A2 1988|
|ISBN(s)||0824024346 1145511473 1177457032 1152605240|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Zenon W. Pylyshyn (2001). Connecting Vision with the World: Tracking the Missing Link. In Joao Branquinho (ed.), The Foundations of Cognitive Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Evan Thompson (1995). Colour Vision: A Study in Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Perception. New York: Routledge.
Anne Jaap Jacobson (2008). What Should a Theory of Vision Look Like? Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):585 – 599.
Robert Hopkins (2005). Thomas Reid on Molyneux's Question. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):340-364.
John Campbell (2005). Information-Processing, Phenomenal Consciousness and Molyneux's Question. In José Luis Bermúdez (ed.), Thought, Reference, and Experience: Themes From the Philosophy of Gareth Evans. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
John Hyman (1994). Reply to Vision. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (176):369-376.
Gerald Vision (1997). Problems of Vision: Rethinking the Causal Theory of Perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
Robert Hopkins (2004). Painting, Sculpture, Sight, and Touch. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):149-166.
Michael Martin (1992). Sight and Touch. In Tim Crane (ed.), The Contents of Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Robert Schwartz (1994). Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?