|Abstract||Like Spanish moss on a live oak tree, the scientific study of meaning in language has expanded in the last 100 years, and continues to expand steadily. In this essay I want to chart some central themes in that expansion, including their histories and their important figures. Our attention will be directed toward what is called 'formal semantics', which is the adaptation to natural language of analytical techniques from logic. The first, background, section of the paper will survey the changing attitudes of linguists toward semantics into the last third of the century. The second and third sections will examine current formal approaches to meaning. In the final section I will summarize some of the common assumptions of the approaches examined in the middle sections of the paper, sketch a few alternatives, and make some daring predictions|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Juan Barba (2007). Formal Semantics in the Age of Pragmatics. Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (6):637-668.
Hans Kamp & Barbara Hall Partee (eds.) (2004). Context-Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning. Elsevier.
Chris Fox (2005). Foundations of Intensional Semantics. Blackwell Pub..
David Levy & Eduardo Zamuner, The Architecture of Meaning: Wittgenstein's Tractatus and Formal Semantics.
Jaroslav Peregrin (2008). Brandom’s Incompatibility Semantics. Philosophical Topics 36 (2):99-121.
Emma Borg (2004). Minimal Semantics. Oxford University Press.
Emma Borg (2004). Formal Semantics and Intentional States. Analysis 64 (3):215–223.
Jaroslav Peregrin (2006). Meaning as an Inferential Role. Erkenntnis 64 (1):1-35.
Added to index2011-05-19
Total downloads56 ( #17,784 of 549,069 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,099 of 549,069 )
How can I increase my downloads?