The reductionist blind spot
| Abstract | Can there be higher level laws of nature even though everything is reducible to the fundamental laws of physics? The computer science notion of level of abstraction explains how there can be. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesFrank H. Durgin (1995). On the Filling in of the Visual Blind Spot: Some Rules of Thumb. Perception 24:827-40.
Richard Knowles Morris (1954). The Blind Spot in Education. Educational Theory 4 (4):274-288.
Stefan Mattessich (2011). The Blind Spot. Angelaki 15 (2):55-68.
Pierre Poirier (2006). Finding a Place for Elimination in Inter-Level Reductionist Activities: Reply to Wimsatt. Synthese 151 (3):477 - 483.
Robert N. McCauley (1993). Why the Blind Can't Lead the Blind: Dennett on the Blind Spot, Blindsight, and Sensory Qualia. Consciousness and Cognition 2 (2):155-64.
Ikuya Murakami (1998). A Retinotopic Representation of Filling In: Further Supporting Evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):765-766.
K. Kranda (1998). Blindsight in the Blind Spot. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):762-763.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,211 of 548,972 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
