Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (1):73-96 (2004)
|Abstract||In his recent work, Jürgen Habermas signals the abandonment of his earlier claims to justify human rights and universalist morality. This paper explains the above shift, arguing that it is the inescapable result of his attempts in recent years to accommodate pluralism. The paper demonstrates how Habermass universal pragmatic justification of modern normative standards was inextricably tied to his consensus theory of validity. He was compelled by the structure of that argument to count on the current or future availability of a unified framework within which all can potentially articulate their needs and interests. With his abandonment of the justification Habermas has rid discourse theory of this controversial assumption. In weakening its defense of human rights and universalist morality against the charge of ethnocentrism, he has strengthened his theorys foothold in the lived pluralist world. Key Words: argumentation ethnocentrism Habermas human rights justification legitimacy pluralism rational consensus Rehg.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mathieu Deflem (ed.) (1996). Habermas, Modernity, and Law. Sage Publications.
Rainer Forst (2011). The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. Columbia University Press.
Alessandro Ferrara (2003). Two Notions of Humanity and the Judgment Argument for Human Rights. Political Theory 31 (3):392-420.
Gunnar Beck (2008). The Mythology of Human Rights. Ratio Juris 21 (3):312-347.
J. Pedersen (2012). Justification and Application: The Revival of the Rawls-Habermas Debate. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):399-432.
James Gordon Finlayson (2000). Modernity and Morality in Habermas's Discourse Ethics. Inquiry 43 (3):319 – 340.
Doris Schroeder (2012). Human Rights and Human Dignity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3):323-335.
Jon Mahoney (2001). Rights Without Dignity? Some Critical Reflections on Habermas's Procedural Model of Law and Democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (3):21-40.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads111 ( #6,353 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,269 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?