Canny resemblance
Philosophical Review 118 (2):183-223 (2009)
| Abstract | Depiction is the form of representation distinctive of figurative paintings, drawings, and photographs. Accounts of depiction attempt to specify the relation something must bear to an object in order to depict it. Resemblance accounts hold that the notion of resemblance is necessary to the specification of this relation. Several difficulties with such analyses have led many philosophers to reject the possibility of an adequate resemblance account of depiction. This essay outlines these difficulties and argues that current resemblance accounts succumb to them. It then develops an alternative resemblance account, drawing on Grice's account of nonnatural meaning and its role in determining sentence meaning to argue that something depicts an object if it bears intention-based resemblances to the object that jointly capture its overall appearance. In addition to solving the metaphysical problem of what it is for something to depict an object, this account also sheds significant light on the epistemological issue of how we are able to work out that something depicts an object. This essay argues that our ability to work out that something depicts an object results from both our more general ability to identify intentions from the products of communicative behavior and our knowledge of stylistic conventions. This account avoids the difficulties that face rival attempts to analyze depiction in terms of resemblance. It also clarifies and explains the features that distinguish depictive from nondepictive representation. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSophie Gibb (2007). Is the Partial Identity Account of Property Resemblance Logically Incoherent? Dialectica 61 (4):539-558.
Michael Newall (2006). Pictures, Colour and Resemblance. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):587–595.
Flint Schier (1986). Deeper Into Pictures: An Essay on Pictorial Representation. Cambridge University Press.
Alexander Bird (2003). Resemblance Nominalism and Counterparts. Analysis 63 (3):221–228.
Ben Blumson (2008). Depiction and Convention. Dialectica 62 (3):335-348.
John Dilworth (2005). Resemblance, Restriction, and Content-Bearing Features. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (1):67–70.
Hannes Leitgeb (2008). An Impossibility Result on Semantic Resemblance. Dialectica 62 (3):293-306.
David Manley (2002). Properties and Resemblance Classes. Noûs 36 (1):75–96.
Gavin McIntosh (2003). Depiction Unexplained: Peacocke and Hopkins on Pictorial Representation. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (3):279-288.
Ben Blumson (2009). Defining Depiction. British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (2):143-157.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-03-19Total downloads105 ( #5,549 of 549,013 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,706 of 549,013 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
