Styles of sociological thought: Sociologies, epistemologies, and the mexican and U.s. Quests for truth
Graduate studies at Western
Sociological Theory 24 (1):1 - 41 (2006)
|Abstract||Both U.S. and Mexican sociologies allege that they are in the business of making true scientific knowledge claims about the social world. Conventional conceptions of science notwithstanding, I demonstrate that their claims to truth and scientificity are based on alternative epistemological grounds. Drawing a random sample of nonquantitative articles from four leading journals, I show that, first, they assign a different role to theories, and indeed they have dissimilar understandings of what a theory should consist of. Second, whereas U.S. sociology actively struggles against subjectivity, Mexican sociology maximizes the potentials of subjective viewpoints. Third, U.S. sociologists tend to regard highly and Mexican sociologists to eagerly disregard the principle of ethical neutrality. These consistent and systematic differences raise two theoretical issues. First, I argue that Mexican and U.S. sociologies are epistemologically, semantically, and perceptually incommensurable. I contend that this problem is crucial for sociology's interest in the social conditioning of scientific knowledge's content. Second, I suggest four lines of thought that can help us explain the epistemological differences I find. Finally, I argue that sociologists would greatly profit from studying epistemologies in the same fashion they have studied other kinds of scientific and nonscientific beliefs|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gabriel Abend (2008). The Meaning of 'Theory'. Sociological Theory 26 (2):173 - 199.
Julie Whitaker (2009). Mexican Deaths in the Arizona Desert: The Culpability of Migrants, Humanitarian Workers, Governments, and Businesses. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (2):365 - 376.
John A. Parnell (2004). Variations in Strategic Philosophy Among American and Mexican Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 50 (3):267-278.
Richard Machalek & Michael W. Martin (2004). Sociology and the Second Darwinian Revolution: A Metatheoretical Analysis. Sociological Theory 22 (3):455-476.
Elizabeth Jackson (1911). A Mexican-Aryan Comparative Vocabulary. The Radicals of the Mexican or Navatl Language, with Their Cognates in the Aryan Languages of the Old World, Chiefly Sanskrit, Greek, Latin, Germanic. By T. S. Denison, A.M., Author of Mexican in Aryan Phonology, The Primitive Aryans of America. 8vo. Pp. 110. Chicago (163, Randolph Street), T. M. Denison. 1909. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 25 (08):266-267.
Barry Carr (1987). Crisis in Mexican Communism: The Extraordinary Congress of the Mexican Communist Party. Science and Society 51 (1):43 - 67.
Patrick Romanell (1969). Making of the Mexican Mind. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.
Carlos Alberto Sánchez & Jules Simon (eds.) (2010). The Thought and Social Engagement in the Mexican-American Philosophy of John H. Haddox: A Collection of Critical Appreciations. Edwin Mellen Press.
William T. Lynch (2005). The Ghost of Wittgenstein: Forms of Life, Scientific Method, and Cultural Critique. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (2):139-174.
Janet Marta, Christina M. Heiss & Steven A. De Lurgio (2008). An Exploratory Comparison of Ethical Perceptions of Mexican and U.S. Marketers. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (3):539 - 555.
Added to index2009-02-05
Total downloads78 ( #12,550 of 739,125 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,125 )
How can I increase my downloads?