Graduate studies at Western
American Political Science Review 99 (1):45-60 (2005)
|Abstract||Two arguments apparently support the thesis that collective identity presupposes an Other: the recognition argument, according to which seeing myself as a self requires recognition by an other whom I also recognize as a self (Hegel); and the dialogic argument, according to which my sense of self can only develop dialogically (Taylor). But applying these arguments to collective identity involves a compositional fallacy. Two modern ideologies mask the particularist thesis’s falsehood. The ideology of indivisible state sovereignty makes sovereignty as such appear particularistic by fusing “internal” with “external” sovereignty; nationalism imagines national identity as particularistic by linking it to sovereignty. But the concatenation of internal sovereignty, external sovereignty, and nation is contingent. Schmitt’s thesis that “the political” presupposes an other conflates internal and external sovereignty, while Mouffe’s neo-Schmittianism conflates difference (Derrida) with alterity. A shared global identity may face many obstacles, but metaphysical impossibility and conceptual confusion are not among them.|
|Keywords||collective identity sovereignty recognition difference solidarity Carl Schmitt Jacques Derrida|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Josè Medina (2003). Identity Trouble: Disidentification and the Problem of Difference. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (6):655-680.
Charles Barbour & George Pavlich (eds.) (2010). After Sovereignty: On the Question of Political Beginnings. Routledge.
Jeffrey Paris (2004). Kurios George and the Sovereign State. Radical Philosophy Review 7 (2):115-134.
Jiri Priban (2012). Self-Reference of the Constitutional State: A Systems Theory Interpretation of the Kelsen-Schmitt Debate. Jurisprudence 2 (2):309-328.
María Martínez González (2008). Feminist Praxis Challenges the Identity Question: Toward New Collective Identity Metaphors. Hypatia 23 (3):pp. 22-38.
Rory J. Conces (2001). Justifying Coercive and Non-Coercive Intervention: Strategic and Humanitarian Arguments. Acta Analytica 16 (27):133-52.
Pavlos Eleftheriadis (2010). Law and Sovereignty. Law and Philosophy 29 (5):535-569.
S. Akhtar (2011). Liberal Recognition for Identity? Only for Particularized Ones. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):66-87.
Allison Weir (2008). Global Feminism and Transformative Identity Politics. Hypatia 23 (4):pp. 110-133.
Amy Allen (1999). Solidarity After Identity Politics: Hannah Arendt and the Power of Feminist Theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (1):97-118.
Miriam Ronzoni (2012). Two Conceptions of State Sovereignty and Their Implications for Global Institutional Design. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (5):573-591.
Katherine E. Tonkiss (2013). Post-National Citizenship Without Post-National Identity? A Case Study of UK Immigration Policy and Intra-EU Migration. Journal of Global Ethics 9 (1):35-48.
J. Derrida (2003). The "World" of the Enlightenment to Come (Exception, Calculation, Sovereignty). Research in Phenomenology 33 (1):9-52.
Michael Naas (2006). "One Nation … Indivisible": Jacques Derrida on the Autoimmunity of Democracy and the Sovereignty of God. Research in Phenomenology 36 (1):15-44.
Added to index2012-01-07
Total downloads13 ( #95,599 of 739,345 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,345 )
How can I increase my downloads?