In defence of the universalization principle in discourse ethics
Philosophical Forum 36 (2):193–211 (2005)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPeter Schroeder-Heister (2007). Generalized Definitional Reflection and the Inversion Principle. Logica Universalis 1 (2).
Joshua M. Glasgow (2003). Expanding the Limits of Universalization. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (1):23-47.
Pablo Gilabert (2005). A Substantivist Construal of Discourse Ethics. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (3):405 – 437.
Cristina LaFont (2005). Universalization or Threat Advantage?: The Difficult Dialogue Between Discourse Ethics and the Theory of Rational Choice. Dialogue 44 (2):373-382.
Eduardo Medieta (1999). Ethics for an Age of Globalization and Exclusion. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (2).
Michael Moehler (2012). A Hobbesian Derivation of the Principle of Universalization. Philosophical Studies 158 (1):83-107.
Scott Forschler (2007). How to Make Ethical Universalization Tests Work. Journal of Value Inquiry 41 (1).
William Rehg (1991). Discourse and the Moral Point of View: Deriving a Dialogical Principle of Universalization. Inquiry 34 (1):27 – 48.
Pablo Gilabert (2005). Should Discourse Ethics Do Without a Principle of Universalization? Philosophical Forum 36 (2):183–191.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads23 ( #53,763 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
