Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 138 (3):349 - 365 (2008)
|Abstract||Samuel Scheffler has recently argued that some relationships are non-instrumentally valuable; that such relationships give rise to “underived” special responsibilities; that there is a genuine tension between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities; and that we must consequently strike a balance between the two. We argue that there is no such tension and propose an alternative approach to the relation between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities. First, while some relationships are non-instrumentally valuable, no relationship is unconditionally valuable. Second, whether such relationships give rise to special responsibilities is conditional on those relationships not violating certain moral constraints. Third, these moral constraints arise from within cosmopolitan egalitarianism itself. Thus the value of relationships and the special responsibilities to which they give rise arise within the parameters of cosmopolitan egalitarianism itself. The real tension is not between cosmopolitan equality and special responsibilities, but between special responsibilities and the various general duties that arise from the recognition, demanded by cosmopolitan egalitarianism, of a multiplicity of other basic goods. Indeed, even the recognition of special relationships itself gives rise to general duties that may condition and/or weigh against putative special responsibilities|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kok-Chor Tan (2002). Liberal Nationalism and Cosmopolitan Justice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):431-461.
Niclas Rönnström (2011). Cosmopolitan Communication and the Broken Dream of a Common Language. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (3):260-282.
Hugh LaFollette (2003). Thomas W. Pogge, World Hunger and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms:World Hunger and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Ethics 113 (4):907-911.
Nancy S. Jecker (1990). Anencephalic Infants and Special Relationships. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (4).
Kristien Hens (2009). Ethical Responsibilities Towards Dogs: An Inquiry Into the Dog–Human Relationship. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (1):3-14.
Joseph Millum (2008). How Do We Acquire Parental Responsibilities? Social Theory and Practice 34 (1):71-93.
Christian Barry & Pablo Gilabert (2008). Does Global Egalitarianism Provide an Impractical and Unattractive Ideal of Justice? International Affairs 84 (5):1025-1039.
John Douard (1990). Ethics, AIDS, and Community Responsibility. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (3).
Gillian Brock (2005). Egalitarianism, Ideals, and Cosmopolitan Justice. Philosophical Forum 36 (1):1–30.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads133 ( #4,439 of 753,454 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #38,079 of 753,454 )
How can I increase my downloads?