David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Political Science Review 106 (4):867-882 (2012)
Cultural-nationalist and democratic theory both seek to legitimize political power via collective self-rule: their principle of legitimacy refers right back to the very persons over whom political power is exercised. But such self-referential theories are incapable of jointly solving the distinct problems of legitimacy and boundaries, which they necessarily combine, once it is assumed that the self-ruling collectivity must be a pre-political, in-principle bounded, ground of legitimacy. Cultural nationalism claims that political power is legitimate insofar as it expresses the nation’s pre-political culture, but it cannot fix cultural-national boundaries pre-politically. Hence the collapse into ethnic nationalism. Traditional democratic theory claims that political power is legitimized pre-politically, but cannot itself legitimize the boundaries of the people. Hence the collapse into cultural nationalism. Only once we recognize that the demos is in principle unbounded, and abandon the quest for a pre-political ground of legitimacy, can democratic theory fully avoid this collapse of demos into nation into ethnos. But such a theory departs radically from traditional theory.
|Keywords||cultural nationalism ethnic nationalism democratic boundary problem all-subjected principle democratic legitimacy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Luara Ferracioli (2015). The Anarchist's Myth: Autonomy, Children, and State Legitimacy. Hypatia 30 (1):370-385.
Similar books and articles
Arash Abizadeh (2005). Was Fichte an Ethnic Nationalist? On Cultural Nationalism and its Double. History of Political Thought 26 (2):334-359.
Arash Abizadeh (2004). Liberal Nationalist Versus Postnational Social Integration: On the Nation's Ethno-Cultural Particularity and ‘Concreteness’. Nations and Nationalism 10 (3):231-250.
Cornelius Kampe (2000). In Defense of Nationalism with Reference to Canada and the Baltics. Social Philosophy Today 16:47-56.
Arash Abizadeh (2004). Historical Truth, National Myths and Liberal Democracy: On the Coherence of Liberal Nationalism. Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (3):291–313.
Simon Căbulea May (2009). Religious Democracy and the Liberal Principle of Legitimacy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (2):136-170.
Nicholas Xenos (1996). Civic Nationalism: Oxymoron? Critical Review 10 (2):213-231.
Robert Audi (2009). Nationalism, Patriotism, and Cosmopolitanism in an Age of Globalization. Journal of Ethics 13 (4):365-381.
Richard W. Miller (1997). Killing for the Homeland: Patriotism, Nationalism and Violence. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 1 (2):165-185.
Richard W. Bensel (1997). Killing for the Homeland: Patriotism, Nationalism and Violence. Journal of Ethics 1:165-85.
Andrew Oldenquist (2001). Three Kinds of Nationalism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):63-72.
Arash Abizadeh (2008). Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders. Political Theory 36 (1):37-65.
Kai Nielsen (2003). Toward a Liberal Socialist Cosmopolitan Nationalism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (4):437 – 463.
David Owen (2012). Constituting the Polity, Constituting the Demos: On the Place of the All Affected Interests Principle in Democratic Theory and in Resolving the Democratic Boundary Problem. Ethics and Global Politics 5 (3):129-152.
Added to index2012-08-07
Total downloads72 ( #61,305 of 1,911,645 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #55,078 of 1,911,645 )
How can I increase my downloads?