From “Either-Or” to “When and How”: A Context-Dependent Model of Culture in Action
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (2):155-180 (2012)
| Abstract | In this article, I outline a framework for the sociological study of culture that connects three intertwined elements of human culture (cultural motivations, resources, and meanings) and demonstrates the concrete contexts under which each most critically influences actions and their subsequent outcomes. In contrast to models that cast motivations, resources, and meanings as competing explanations of how culture affects action, I argue that these are fundamental constituent elements of culture that are inseparable, interdependent, and simultaneously operative. Which element provides the strongest link to action, and how this link operates, must be understood as a function of the actor's position within wider social contexts. I argue that on average motivations have the most discernable link to action within a social strata, cultural resources provide the strongest link across strata, and meanings have the greatest direct influence when codified and sanctioned. I then offer a reframing and synthesis that reintegrates previously “competing” theories of culture into a more holistic context-dependent model of culture in action. Finally, I use evidence from prior empirical research, as well as new data from an ongoing ethnographic study of health behaviors among the aged, to show how various elements of culture are concretely linked to action in eight different social contexts. In doing so, I provide a roadmap for the transition out of the “either-or” logic underlying much of cultural theory and reemphasize the importance of the classical sociological concern for “when” and “how” various aspects of culture influence action and outcomes in concrete social contexts | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPeter Janich (2003). Technology and Levels of Culture. Poiesis and Praxis 1 (4):263-273.
Anne Kane (1991). Cultural Analysis in Historical Sociology: The Analytic and Concrete Forms of the Autonomy of Culture. Sociological Theory 9 (1):53-69.
Machiel Keestra (2011). Understanding Human Action: Integrating Meanings, Mechanisms, Causes, and Contexts. In Repko Allen, Szostak Rick & Newell William (eds.), Interdisciplinary Research: Case Studies of Integrative Understandings of Complex Problems. Sage.
Richard L. Wood (1999). Religious Culture and Political Action. Sociological Theory 17 (3):307-332.
Anne E. Kane (1997). Theorizing Meaning Construction in Social Movements: Symbolic Structures and Interpretation During the Irish Land War, 1879-1882. Sociological Theory 15 (3):249-276.
Jo Ann Ho (2010). Ethical Perception: Are Differences Between Ethnic Groups Situation Dependent? Business Ethics 19 (2):154-182.
Jeffrey C. Alexander (2004). Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance Between Ritual and Strategy. Sociological Theory 22 (4):527-573.
Pitirim Aleksandrovich Sorokin (1957/1985). Social and Cultural Dynamics: A Study of Change in Major Systems of Art, Truth, Ethics, Law, and Social Relationships. Transaction Books.
Dana Irina (2011). A Culture of Human Rights and the Right to Culture. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):30-48.
Nermin Gedik (2007). The Ambiguity of the Term 'Culture' and its Consequences for the Protection of Human Rights. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:33-36.
Giuseppe Padovani (2000). The Artificial Between Culture and Nature. AI and Society 14 (3-4):300-313.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-01-18Total downloads2 ( #232,684 of 549,724 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,724 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
