Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy Compass 2 (5):680–698 (2007)
|Abstract||Although the implications of Humes distinction between philosophical anatomy and painting have been the subject of lively scholarly debates, it is a puzzling fact that the details of the distinction itself have largely been a matter of interpretive presumption rather than debate. This would be unproblematic if Humes views about these two species of philosophy were obvious, or if there were a rich standard interpretation of the distinction that we had little reason to doubt. But a careful review of the literature shows neither to be the case. We are far from scholarly consensus about Humes vision of philosophical anatomy and painting, and what unity there is rests on extremely unsteady ground and leaves important questions unanswered. In this article, my aim is three-fold: first, to show that the appearance of well-grounded scholarly unity about Humes distinction is illusory; second, to dispose of those misinterpretations of Humes distinction that are sufficiently at odds with the text that they can be demonstrated to be false in this context; and third, to explore in sufficient detail the numerous questions one might raise about the content of Humes distinction so that the stage might at last be properly set for a truly full account of Humes distinction between philosophical anatomy and painting|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kate Abramson (1999). Hume on Cultural Conflicts of Values. Philosophical Studies 94 (1-2):173-187.
Jacqueline Taylor (2011). Gilding and Staining and the Significance of Our Moral Sentiments. Hume Studies 36 (1):89-95.
Kate Abramson (2001). Sympathy and the Project of Hume's Second Enquiry. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 83 (1):45-80.
Nigel Wentworth (2004). The Phenomenology of Painting. Cambridge University Press.
Tamás Demeter (2012). The Anatomy and Physiology of Mind: Hume's Vitalistic Account. In H. F. J. Horstmanshoff, H. King & C. Zittel (eds.), Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe. Brill.
Eric Schliesser (2007). 11. “Two Definitions of ‘Cause,’ Newton, and the Significance of the Humean Distinction Between Natural and Philosophical Relations,”. Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 5 (1):83-101.
Paul Hoffman (2011). Hume on the Distinction of Reason. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1131 - 1141.
David Johnson (2009). Merleau-Ponty and the Other World of Painting: A Response. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 40 (1):89-97.
David Landy (2006). Hume's Impression/Idea Distinction. Hume Studies 32 (1):119-139.
Bram Ieven (2011). Deleuze Modernist. Deleuze Studies 5 (1):84-96.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads74 ( #13,810 of 750,298 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,000 of 750,298 )
How can I increase my downloads?