David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (6):491-535 (2011)
The central idea behind this paper is that presuppositions of soft triggers arise from the way our attention structures the informational content of a sentence. Some aspects of the information conveyed are such that we pay attention to them by default, even in the absence of contextual information. On the other hand, contextual cues or conversational goals can divert attention to types of information that we would not pay attention to by default. Either way, whatever we do not pay attention to, be it by default, or in context, is what ends up presupposed by soft triggers. This paper attempts to predict what information in the sentence is likely to end up being the main point (i.e. what we pay attention to) and what information is independent from this, and therefore likely presupposed. It is proposed that this can be calculated by making reference to event times. The notion of aboutness used to calculate independence is based on that of Demolombe and Fariñas del Cerro (In: Holdobler S (ed) Intellectics and computational logic: papers in honor of Wolfgang Bibel, 2000)
|Keywords||Presuppositions Attention Soft triggers Aboutness Lexical semantics of verbs Factivity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
D. Abusch (2009). Presupposition Triggering From Alternatives. Journal of Semantics 27 (1):37-80.
Alexandra Aikhenvald (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.
Gennaro Chierchia & Sally McConnell-Ginet (2000). Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Mit Press.
Paul Egré (2008). Question-Embedding and Factivity. Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1):85-125.
Anastasia Giannakidou (1999). Affective Dependencies. Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (4):367-421.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Friederike Moltmann (2006). Presuppositions and Quantifier Domains. Synthese 149 (1):179 - 224.
Bart Geurts (1998). Presuppositions and Anaphors in Attitude Contexts. Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (6):545-601.
Alex Lascarides (1998). The Semantics and Pragmatics of Presupposition. Journal of Semantics 15 (3):239-300.
Dilip Patel & Shushma Patel (2003). The Cognitive Process of Problem Solving: A Soft Systems Approach. [REVIEW] Brain and Mind 4 (2):283-295.
Theo H. Veldsman (2012). The Soft Underbelly of Corporate Governance (Part 1): The Hardware of Board Dynamics. African Journal of Business Ethics 6 (1):56.
Theo H. Veldsman (2012). The Soft Underbelly of Corporate Governance (Part 2): The Software of Board Dynamics. African Journal of Business Ethics 6 (1):65.
Craige Roberts, Mandy Simons & Judith Tonhauser, Presupposition, Conventional Implicature, and Beyond: A Unified Account of Projection.
Kent Johnson (2007). An Overview of Lexical Semantics. Philosophy Compass 3 (1):119-134.
David Widerker (2002). Why God's Beliefs Are Not Hard-Type Soft Facts. Religious Studies 38 (1):77-88.
Hazel Pearson, Presupposition Accommodation in Local Contexts: Why Global Accommodation is Not Enough.
Patrick Todd (2013). Soft Facts and Ontological Dependence. Philosophical Studies 164 (3):829-844.
Joseph L. Camp Jr (1988). Why Attributions of Aboutness Report Soft Facts. Philosophical Topics 16 (1):5-30.
Added to index2012-05-01
Total downloads17 ( #97,706 of 1,101,599 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #59,635 of 1,101,599 )
How can I increase my downloads?