David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Value Inquiry 26 (3):317-340 (1992)
In what precedes, I have argued that Aristotle does not, in his ethics, commit three metaphysical errors sometimes imputed to him: he does not define the good as a fact; he does not claim that human beings move by nature towards their telos; he does not claim, in the ergon argument, that human beings are fixed rather than versatile. Instead, I have shown, he does the opposite in each case: he argues that the good cannot be defined as a fact; he claims that human beings move towards their telos only if they have virtue and virtue is not by nature; he locates, in the human ergon, that which is responsible for human versatility. Finally, I have shown by example that the metaphysical commitments of Aristotle's account of human happiness are not as controversial as they seem.If all of this is true, then perhaps the disorder that has existed in ethics since the enlightenment has been misdiagnosed. Perhaps it is not due to an unhappy choice between end-neutral emotivism on the one hand and Aristotle's bad metaphysics on the other. Perhaps instead it is due, at least in part, to a too hasty rejection of Aristotle's ethics on the grounds of a rejection of his biology
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dorothea Frede (2009). Nicomachean Ethics VIII. 11-12: Pleasure. In Carlo Natali (ed.), Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, Book Vii: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford University Press.
Gwenaëlle Aubry (2009). Nicomachean Ethics VII. 14 (1154a22-B34) : The Pain of the Living and Divine Pleasure. In Carlo Natali (ed.), Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Uri D. Leibowitz (2013). Particularism in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (2):121-147.
István Pieter Bejczy (ed.) (2008). Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, 1200 -1500. Brill.
Aristotle (2006/1998). Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press, USA.
S. Alexander (1893). Book Review:Notes on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. J. A. Stewart; The Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. J. E. C. Welldon. [REVIEW] Ethics 4 (1):123-.
Catherine Osborne (2007). Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics – Gabriel Richardson Lear. [REVIEW] Philosophical Investigations 30 (1):92–96.
Jon Miller (ed.) (2011). Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Deborah Achtenberg (1989). The Role of the Ergon Argument in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Ancient Philosophy 9 (1):37-47.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads64 ( #23,729 of 1,102,846 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #36,605 of 1,102,846 )
How can I increase my downloads?