The evidence against Kronz
Philosophical Studies 67 (2):169 - 175 (1992)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFrederick M. Kronz (1994). Philosophy of Physics. The Review of Metaphysics 48 (1):168-170.
Peter Achinstein (2001). The Book of Evidence. Oxford University Press.
Frederick M. Kronz (1993). Book Review. [REVIEW] Mind 102 (408).
Peter Achinstein (ed.) (1983). The Concept of Evidence. Oxford University Press.
Steven Gimbel (1999). Peirce Snatching: Towards a More Pragmatic View of Evidence. Erkenntnis 51 (2-3):207-231.
Steven Gimbel (2004). Restoring Ambiguity to Achinstein's Account of Evidence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):269-285.
Sherrilyn Roush (2004). Discussion Note: Positive Relevance Defended. Philosophy of Science 71 (1):110-116.
Frederick M. Kronz (1992). Carnap and Achinstein on Evidence. Philosophical Studies 67 (2):151 - 167.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #133,305 of 548,969 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
