Thanks to Reviewers 2006

, , , , , , , , &
Hypatia (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Submission Reviewers for Volume 2, 2006.D. P. Dash - 2006 - Journal of Research Practice 2 (2).
Peer reviewers can meet journals’ criteria for authorship.Thomas Erren, Michael Erren & David Shaw - 2013 - British Medical Journal 346:f166.
The tragedy of the common reviewers: the peer review process.Ulysses Paulino De Albuquerque - unknown
Ethical concerns of nursing reviewers: An international survey.Marion Broome, Molly C. Dougherty, Margaret C. Freda, Margaret H. Kearney & Judith G. Baggs - 2010 - Nursing Ethics 17 (6):741-748.
Annual acknowledgement of manuscript reviewers.Adrian Aldcroft - 2013 - BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):14.
Significance of Expressions for the Development of Emotions.Manfred Holodynski & Wolfgang Friedlmeier - 2010 - Emotion Review 2 (3):304-305.
Ackerman, Bruce, Anne Alstott, Philippe Van Parijs, and others. 2006. Redesigning Distribution: Basic Income and Stakeholder Grants as Alternative Cornerstones for a More Egalitarian Capitalism. The Real Utopias Project, vol. 5. Edited by Erik Olin Wright. London: Verso. xii+ 228 pp. Alcoff, Linda Martin. 2006. Visible Identities: Race, Gender, and the Self. Studies. [REVIEW]Graham Macdonald - 2006 - Philosophical Review 115 (3).
What We Owe the Author: rethinking editorial peer review.N. J. Crigger - 1998 - Nursing Ethics 5 (5):451-457.
Evidence for the effectiveness of Peer review.Robert H. Fletcher & Suzanne W. Fletcher - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):35-50.
Evidence for the effectiveness of peer review.Professor Robert H. Fletcher & Professor Suzanne W. Fletcher - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):35-50.
Should Biomedical Publishing Be “Opened Up”? Toward a Values-Based Peer-Review Process.Wendy Lipworth, Ian H. Kerridge, Stacy M. Carter & Miles Little - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):267-280.
Has Penrose Disproved A.I.?Robin Hanson - unknown
A Kuhnian Critique of Psychometric Research on Peer Review.Carole J. Lee - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (5):859-870.
The representation of women as authors, reviewers, editors-in-Chief, and editorial board members at six general medical journals in 2010 and 2011.Thomas Erren, Juliane Groß, David Shaw & Barbara Selle - 2014 - JAMA Internal Medicine 174 (4):633.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-09

Downloads
40 (#387,619)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Linda Martín Alcoff
CUNY Graduate Center
Alison Ainley
Anglia Ruskin University
Amy Baehr
Hofstra University
2 more

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references