Graduate studies at Western
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):115-132 (2009)
|Abstract||The following theses are defended. Conflict has importantly valuable functions, but we obviously need to limit its destructiveness. The efficacy of reasoning together in resolving or restraining conflict is limited; it needs to be supplemented by procedures such as negotiation, compromise, and voting. Despite the urgency of justice, when the resolution or limitation of a conflict needs to be negotiated, the best attainable outcome will often not seem completely just to all parties, and some claims of justice, as seen by the parties, may need to be subordinated to other moral considerations.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Luban (2001). Stuart Hampshire, Justice Is Conflict:Justice Is Conflict. Ethics 112 (1):156-157.
Ruth Chang (2009). Reflections on the Reasonable and the Rational in Conflict Resolution. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):133 - 160.
Mark R. Nixon (1994). Ethical Reasoning and Privileged Information: Resolving Moral Conflict. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (7):571 - 577.
David Schmidtz (2000). Natural Enemies: An Anatomy of Environmental Conflict. Environmental Ethics 22 (4):397-408.
K. Helmut Reich (2002). Developing the Horizons of the Mind: Relational and Contextual Reasoning and the Resolution of Cognitive Conflict. Cambridge University Press.
Eric Patterson (2010). Ethics and US Af-Pak Policy. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):31-46.
John Kohls & Paul Buller (1994). Resolving Cross-Cultural Ethical Conflict: Exploring Alternative Strategies. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (1):31 - 38.
Daniel McInerny (2006). The Difficult Good: A Thomistic Approach to Moral Conflict and Human Happiness. Fordham University Press.
Ivo Aertsen (ed.) (2008). Restoring Justice After Large-Scale Violent Conflicts: Kosovo, Dr Congo and the Israeli-Palestinian Case. Willan.
E. Ceva (2012). Just Interactions in Value Conflicts: The Adversary Argumentation Principle. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (2):149-170.
Added to index2009-06-16
Total downloads56 ( #21,412 of 739,369 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,369 )
How can I increase my downloads?