Graduate studies at Western
Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31 (1):19-37 (2000)
|Abstract||In the late 19th century great changes in theories of light and electricity were in direct conflict with certitude, the view that scientific knowledge is infallible. What is, then, the epistemic status of scientific theory? To resolve this issue Duhem and Poincaré proposed images of fallible knowledge, Instrumentalism and Conventionalism, respectively. Only in 1919–1922, after Einstein's relativity was published, he offered arguments to support Fallibilism, the view that certainty cannot be achieved in science. Though Einstein did not consider Duhem's Instrumentalism, he argued against Poincaré's Conventionalism. Hitherto, Einstein's Fallibilism, as presented at first in a rarely known essay of 1919, was left in the dark. Recently, Howard obscured its meaning. Einstein's essay was never translated into English. In my paper I provide its translation and attempt to shed light on Einstein's view and its context; I also direct attention to Einstein's images of philosophical opportunism in scientific practice.|
|Keywords||certitude conventionalism deduction Einstein fallibilism induction Popper|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John F. Kiley (1970). Einstein and Aquinas: A Rapprochement. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff.
Steven Gimbel (2012). Einstein's Jewish Science: Physics at the Intersection of Politics and Religion. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Nicholas Maxwell (1993). Induction and Scientific Realism: Einstein Versus Van Fraassen Part One: How to Solve the Problem of Induction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (1):61-79.
Ronny Desmet (2008). How Did Whitehead Become Einstein's Antagonist? Process Studies 37 (2):5-23.
Yemima Ben-Menahem (2001). Convention: Poincaré and Some of His Critics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):471-513.
Richard M. Burian (1990). Maiocchi on Duhem, Howard on Duhem and Einstein: Historiographical Comments. Synthese 83 (3):401 - 408.
Nicholas Maxwell (1993). Induction and Scientific Realism: Einstein Versus Van Fraassen Part Three: Einstein, Aim-Oriented Empiricism and the Discovery of Special and General Relativity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (2):275-305.
Don Howard (1990). Einstein and Duhem. Synthese 83 (3):363 - 384.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #90,518 of 725,792 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 725,792 )
How can I increase my downloads?