How can a ratings-based method for assessing corporate social responsibility (csr) provide an incentive to firms excluded from socially responsible investment indices to invest in csr?
Journal of Business Ethics 82 (4):899 - 905 (2008)
|Abstract||Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) indices play a major role in the stock markets. A connection between doing good and doing well in business is implied. Leading indices, such as the Domini Social Index and others, exemplify the movement toward investing in socially responsible corporations. However, the question remains: Does the ratings-based methodology for assessing corporate social responsibility (CSR) provide an incentive to firms excluded from SRI indices to invest in CSR? Not in its current format. The ratings-based methodology employed by SRI indices in their selection processes excludes many corporations by creating limited-membership lists. This received ratings-based structure is yet to offer an incentive for most of the excluded corporations to invest in improving their levels of CSR. We, therefore, ask under what circumstances a ratings-based method for assessing CSR could provide an incentive to firms excluded from SRI indices to invest in CSR. In this article, we attempt to offer a theoretical reply to this question. We show that when all firms are publicly ranked according to SRI index parameters, such indices can indeed create a market incentive for increased investment by firms in improving their performance in the area of social responsibility. We further show that this incentive tapers off as the amount of investment required exceeds a certain point or if the amount of payback on that investment fails to reach a certain threshold.|
|Keywords||corporate social responsibility social responsible investment ethical investment corporate social performance financial performance theory of SRI|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Manuel Castelo Branco & Lúcia Lima Rodrigues (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (2):111 - 132.
Irina Soboleva (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility in Russia. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:269-282.
Steven Scalet & Thomas F. Kelly (2010). Csr Rating Agencies: What is Their Global Impact? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 94 (1):69 - 88.
Christian Fieseler (2011). On the Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions of Equity Analysts. Business Ethics 20 (2):131-147.
Klaus-Michael Menz (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility: Is It Rewarded by the Corporate Bond Market? A Critical Note. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 96 (1):117-134.
Kangtao Ye & Ran Zhang (2011). Do Lenders Value Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence From China. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (2):197-206.
Yan Leung Cheung, Weiqiang Tan, Hee-Joon Ahn & Zheng Zhang (2010). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Matter in Asian Emerging Markets? Journal of Business Ethics 92 (3):401 - 413.
Béatrice Parguel, Florence Benoît-Moreau & Fabrice Larceneux (2011). How Sustainability Ratings Might Deter 'Greenwashing': A Closer Look at Ethical Corporate Communication. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 102 (1):15-28.
Lisa Papania, Daniel M. Shapiro & John Peloza (2008). Social Impact as a Measure of Fit Between Firm Activities and Stakeholder Expectations. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (1):3-16.
Amir Barnea & Amir Rubin (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics 97 (1):71 - 86.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #78,020 of 722,834 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,834 )
How can I increase my downloads?