Notes on Aeschylus, Agamemnon and Sophocles, Antigone
The Classical Review 5 (02):132-134 (1955)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesH. J. Rose (1950). The Agamemnon of Aeschylus Sir Frank Fletcher: Notes to the Agamemnon of Aeschylus. Pp. 79. Oxford: Blackwell, 1949. Paper, 4s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 64 (3-4):105-106.
W. R. Paton (1921). The Agamemnon of Aeschylus The Agamemnon of Aeschylus. Translated by Rushworth Kennard Davis. Oxford: Blackwell, 1919. 4s. 6d Net. The Agamemnon of Aeschylus. Translated by Gilbert Murray. London: Allen and Unwin, 1920. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 35 (5-6):107-108.
R. P. Winnington-Ingram (1959). The Agamemnon (1) J. D. Denniston and Denys Page: Aeschylus, Agamemnon. Pp. Xxxix + 240. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957. Cloth, 21s. Net. (2) Eduard Fraenkel: Der Agamemnon des Aeschylus. Pp. 38. Zürich: Artemis-Verlag, 1957. Paper, 3.80 Sw. Fr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 9 (01):23-26.
A. S. Owen (1934). Emendations and Elucidations of Aeschylus and Sophocles J. E. Harry: Greek Tragedy: Emendations, Interpretations, and Critical Notes. Vol. I: Aeschylus and Sophocles. Pp. Xxiii + 232. New York: Columbia University Press (London: Milford), 1933. Cloth, 24s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 48 (04):128-129.
D. S. T. (1906). Sophocles Antigone 249 Ff., and the Conclusion of the Septem of Aeschylus. The Classical Review 20 (04):208-.
C. R. Haines (1915). Note on the Parallelism Between the Prometheus Vinctus of Aeschylus and the Antigone of Sophocles. The Classical Review 29 (01):8-10.
Janet E. Case (1902). Bayfield's Antigone of Sophocles The Antigone of Sophokles. With Introduction, Notes, and Appendices. By M. A. Bayfield, M.A. Macmillan and Co., Ltd. 1901. Pp. Xxxii, 174. 2s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 16 (06):319-320.
H. L. Lommer (1932). A New Text of the Agamemnon Aeschylus: The Agamemnon. A Revised Text with Introduction, Verse Translation, and Critical Notes. By J. C. Lawson. Pp. Xlviii+168. Cambridge: University Press, 1932. Cloth, 15s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 46 (04):161-163.
T. G. Tucker (1897). Notes on Some Passages of the Agamemnon of Aeschylus. The Classical Review 11 (08):403-405.
James Diggle (1968). Notes on the Agamemnon and Persae of Aeschylus. The Classical Review 18 (01):1-4.
Marcos Bisticas-Cocoves (2005). Tragedy, Comedy, and Ethical Action in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Epoché 10 (1):95-115.
Eduard Fraenkel (1937). A New Text of the Agamemnon The Agamemnon of Aeschylus. A Revised Text with Brief Critical Notes by A. Y. Campbell, Professor of Greek in the University of Liverpool. Pp. Xxiii + 126. London: Hodder and Stoughton (University Press of Liverpool), 1936. Cloth, 7s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (02):59-64.
Andrew Brown (1991). Notes on Sophocles' Antigone. The Classical Quarterly 41 (02):325-.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-12-09Total downloads3 ( #201,930 of 549,073 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
