On the methods of history
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (2):315-324 (1999)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWilliam Berkson (1979). Skeptical Rationalism. Inquiry 22 (1-4):281 – 320.
A. Cornelius Benjamin (1960). Is the Philosophy of Science Scientific? Philosophy of Science 27 (4):351-358.
Eric Schliesser (2005). SOME PRINCIPLES OF ADAM SMITH's NEWTONIAN METHODS IN THE WEALTH OF NATIONS. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 23 (1):33-74.
Aloysius Martinich (2003). Philosophical History of Philosophy. Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (3):405-407.
James T. Shotwell (1920). Christianity and History: III. Chronology and Church History. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 17 (6):141-150.
Peter Achinstein & Laura J. Snyder (eds.) (1994). Scientific Methods: Conceptual and Historical Problems. Krieger Pub. Co..
Gualtiero Piccinini (2003). Epistemic Divergence and the Publicity of Scientific Methods. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34 (3):597-612.
Salo Wittmayer Baron (1986). The Contemporary Relevance of History: A Study in Approaches and Methods. Columbia University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads17 ( #71,063 of 549,066 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,066 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
