Relations, inherence and subsistence: Or, was ockham a Nestorian in christology?
Noûs 16 (1):62-75 (1982)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMarilyn McCord Adams (1976). What Does Ockham Mean by `Supposition'? Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 17 (3):375-391.
Marilyn McCord Adams (1977). Ockham's Nominalism and Unreal Entities. Philosophical Review 86 (2):144-176.
Marilyn McCord Adams (1978). Ockham's Theory of Natural Signification. The Monist 61 (3):444-459.
Marilyn McCord Adams (2001). Ockham on the Soul. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:43-77.
A. K. Anderson (2008). Marilyn McCord Adams, Christ and Horrors: The Coherence of Christology (Current Issues in Theology, No. 4). International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (3):161-165.
Marilyn McCord Adams (1987). William Ockham. University of Notre Dame Press.
Paul Vincent Spade (1990). Ockham, Adams and Connotation: A Critical Notice of Marilyn Adams, William Ockham. Philosophical Review 99 (4):593-612.
Alfred Freddoso (1983). Logic, Ontology and Ockham’s Christology. The New Scholasticism 57 (3):293-330.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads44 ( #25,377 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,790 of 549,196 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
