David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11 (1):31–52 (1981)
The present paper examines the arguments and data presented by Nisbett and Wilson relevant to their thesis that subjects do not have access to their own cognitive processes. It is concluded that their review of previous research is selective and incomplete and that the data they present in behalf of their thesis does not withstand a demand characteristics analysis. Furthermore, their use of observer-subject similarity as evidence of subjects' inability to access cognitive processes makes tests of their hypothesis confounded and, at the same time, reveals limitations in the application of the pre-inquiry quasi-control to research on social behavior. Problems with postexperiment questionnaires, such as the demand characteristics of the inquiry procedure are also considered. Although there are difficulties in assessing subjects' cognitive processes, many of these may be overcome through the application of novel techniques and research conducted on more traditional methods. In contrast to the view that subjects have limited access to cognitive processes and that their verbal reports are not valid, it is concluded that subjects' verbalizations are a rich source of psychological data which must be pursued if we are to tap their cognitive processes and are to gain an adequate understanding of human behavior
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Israel Goldiamond & William F. Hawkins (1958). Vexierversuch: The Log Relationship Between Word-Frequency and Recognition Obtained in the Absence of Stimulus Words. Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (6):457.
Citations of this work BETA
Ben R. Newell & David R. Shanks (2014). Unconscious Influences on Decision Making: A Critical Review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38 (1):1-19.
Peter A. White (2000). Naive Analysis of Food Web Dynamics: A Study of Causal Judgment About Complex Physical Systems. Cognitive Science 24 (4):605-650.
Similar books and articles
Linda B. Smith & Adam Sheya (2010). Is Cognition Enough to Explain Cognitive Development? Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (4):725-735.
Quanxing Xu (2008). Theory on the Cultivation of Cognitive Subjects in Chinese Philosophy. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):39-54.
Scott K. Jones & Kenneth M. Hiltebeitel (1995). Organizational Influence in a Model of the Moral Decision Process of Accountants. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (6):417 - 431.
Benjamin Sachs (2011). Going From Principles to Rules in Research Ethics. Bioethics 25 (1):9-20.
Aaro Toomela & Jüri Allik (1999). Components of Verbal Working Memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):110-110.
Josef Perner & Zoltán Dienes (2003). Developmental Aspects of Consciousness: How Much Theory of Mind Do You Need to Be Consciously Aware? Consciousness and Cognition 12 (1):63-82.
D. Vuysje (1956). "Verification" of Statements in Psychology. Synthese 10 (1):369-372.
Luca Pezzullo (2002). Cheating Neuropsychologists: A Study of Cognitive Processes Involved in Scientific Anomalies Resolution. Mind and Society 3 (1):43-50.
Daniel C. Dennett (1978). Toward a Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #276,630 of 1,726,151 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,151 )
How can I increase my downloads?