Should ethics be more impersonal? A critical notice of Derek Parfit, reasons and persons
Philosophical Review 98 (4):439-484 (1989)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJeremy Allen Byrd (2007). The Perfect Murder: A Philosophical Whodunit. Synthese 157 (1):47 - 58.
Michael Smith (2009). Desires, Values, Reasons, and the Dualism of Practical Reason. Ratio 22 (1):98-125.
Derek A. Parfit (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press.
Stuart Rachels (2001). A Set of Solutions to Parfit's Problems. Noûs 35 (2):214–238.
Jussi Suikkanen & John Cottingham (eds.) (2009). Essays on Derek Parfit's on What Matters. Wiley-Blackwell.
Ronald M. Green (2011). Should We Retire Derek Parfit? Hastings Center Report 41 (1).
Sydney Shoemaker (1985). Critical Notice. Reason and Persons. Derek Parfit. Mind 94 (375):443-453.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads43 ( #26,146 of 549,070 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,070 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
