Some Later Medieval Theories of the Eucharist: Thomas Aquinas, Gilles of Rome, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
OUP Oxford (2010)
|Abstract||How can the Body and Blood of Christ, without ever leaving heaven, come to be really present on eucharistic altars where the bread and wine still seem to be? Thirteenth and fourteenth century Christian Aristotelians thought the answer had to be "transubstantiation." Acclaimed philosopher, Marilyn McCord Adams, investigates these later medieval theories of the Eucharist, concentrating on the writings of Thomas Aquinas, Giles of Rome, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham, with some reference to Peter Lombard, Hugh of St. Victor, and Bonaventure. She examines how their efforts to formulate and integrate this theological datum provoked them to make significant revisions in Aristotelian philosophical theories regarding the metaphysical structure and location of bodies, differences between substance and accidents, causality and causal powers, and fundamental types of change. Setting these developments in the theological context that gave rise to the question draws attention to their understandings of the sacraments and their purpose, as well as to their understandings of the nature and destiny of human beings. Adams concludes that their philosophical modifications were mostly not ad hoc, but systematic revisions that made room for transubstantiation while allowing Aristotle still to describe what normally and naturally happens. By contrast, their picture of the world as it will be (after the last judgment) seems less well integrated with their sacramental theology and their understandings of human nature.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
D. Efird (2012). Some Later Medieval Theories of the Eucharist: Thomas Aquinas, Giles of Rome, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham, by Marilyn McCord Adams. Mind 121 (482):467-470.
Richard Cross (1998). The Physics of Duns Scotus: The Scientific Context of a Theological Vision. Clarendon Press.
Frederick Charles Copleston (1952/2001). Medieval Philosophy: An Introduction. Dover Publications.
Mark Gerald Henninger (1989). Relations: Medieval Theories, 1250-1325. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Williams (ed.) (2003). The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus. Cambridge University Press.
Alfred Freddoso (1986). Human Nature, Potency and the Incarnation. Faith and Philosophy 3 (1):27-53.
Alfred J. Freddoso (1986). Human Nature, Potency and the Incarnation. Faith and Philosophy 3 (1):27-53.
Jeffrey E. Brower, Medieval Theories of Relations. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Charles Reginald Schiller Harris (1927). Duns Scotus. Oxford, the Clarendon Press.
JT Paasch (2012). Divine Production in Late Medieval Trinitarian Theology: Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham. OUP Oxford.
Marilyn McCord Adams (1987). William Ockham. University of Notre Dame Press.
Marilyn McCord Adams & Richard Cross (2005). Aristotelian Substance and Supposits. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 79:15 - 72.
D. E. Luscombe (1997). Medieval Thought. Oxford University Press.
James B. Reichmann (2006). Scotus and Haecceitas, Aquinas and Esse. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):63-75.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Total downloads1 ( #292,879 of 740,090 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,090 )
How can I increase my downloads?