The logical structure of Anselm's arguments
Philosophical Review 80 (1):28-54 (1971)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKatherin A. Rogers (2005). Anselm on Eudaemonism and the Hierarchical Structure of Moral Choice. Religious Studies 41 (3):249-268.
Stan R. Tyvoll (2006). Anselm's Definition of Free Will. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (2):155-171.
Ian Logan (2008). Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
Elke Brendel (2007). Self-Referential Arguments in Philosophy. Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):177-197.
Mark Owen Webb (2005). In Defense of Anselm. Philo 8 (1):55-58.
Jan-R. Sieckmann (2003). Why Non-Monotonic Logic is Inadequate to Represent Balancing Arguments. Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):211-219.
Brian Leftow (2002). Anselm's Neglected Argument. Philosophy 77 (3):331-347.
Tomasz Jarmużek, Maciej Nowicki & Andrzej Pietruszczak (2006). An Outline of the Anselmian Theory of God. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):317-330.
John MacFarlane, Logical Constants. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads41 ( #27,810 of 548,951 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,799 of 548,951 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
