Graduate studies at Western
Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 16 (2):207-236 (2006)
|Abstract||Al-Kindi was influenced by two Greek traditions in his attempts to explain vision, light and color. Most obviously, his works on optics are indebted to Euclid and, perhaps indirectly, to Ptolemy. But he also knew some works from the Aristotelian tradition that touch on the nature of color and vision. Al-Kindi explicitly rejects the Aristotelian account of vision in his De Aspectibus, and adopts a theory according to which we see by means of a visual ray emitted from the eye. But in the same work, al-Kindi draws on Philoponus.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Evan Thompson (1995). Colour Vision. Routledge.
Ian Gold (2001). The Evolution of Color Vision. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):671-671.
Alex Byrne & David Hilbert (2010). How Do Things Look to the Color-Blind? In Jonathan D. Cohen & Mohan Matthen (eds.), Color Ontology and Color Science. Mit Press.
Peter Adamson (2003). Al-Kindi and the Mu‘Tazila: Divine Attributes, Creation and Freedom. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 13 (1):45-77.
David R. Hilbert & Alex Byrne (2010). How Do Things Look to the Color-Blind? In Jonathan Cohen & Mohan Matthen (eds.), Color Ontology and Color Science. Mit Press.
Evan Thompson (1995). Colour Vision: A Study in Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Perception. New York: Routledge.
Peter Adamson (2006). Al-Kind=I. OUP USA.
Mohan P. Matthen (1999). The Disunity of Color. Philosophical Review 108 (1):47-84.
F. R. Pickering (1975). Is Light the Proper Object of Vision? Mind 84 (January):119-121.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #53,719 of 740,021 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,454 of 740,021 )
How can I increase my downloads?