Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):101- (1966)
|Abstract||Many believe that the Marxist philosophy of history entails that man is not free in a sense in which it seems obvious that he is. In particular it is held to be (1) materialistic, (2) holistic, (3) economistic, and (4) fatalistic. It is claimed, in short, that since the Marxist philosophy of history has these features, man is not capable of shaping his own (social) destiny if it is true. I show for each of these features either that it does not entail what it is believed to entail or that it is not correctly attributed to the Marxist philosophy of history|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James D. White (1996). Karl Marx and the Intellectual Origins of Dialectical Materialism. St. Martin's Press.
John Rees (1998). The Algebra of Revolution: The Dialectic and the Classical Marxist Tradition. Routledge.
Sara Fletcher Luther, John J. Neumaier & Howard L. Parsons (eds.) (1995). Diverse Perspectives on Marxist Philosophy: East and West. Greenwood Press.
Richard Hudelson (1993). Has History Refuted Marxism? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (2):180-198.
Matt Perry (2002). Marxism and History. Palgrave.
Luis A. Conde-Costas (1991). The Marxist Theory of Ideology: A Conceptual Analysis. Distributor, Almqvist & Wiksell.
Nick Knight (1996). Li Da and Marxist Philosophy in China. Westview Press.
Tom Rockmore (1992). Irrationalism: Lukács and the Marxist View of Reason. Temple University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #42,081 of 740,197 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,454 of 740,197 )
How can I increase my downloads?