- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Abstraction is uncooperative
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 14 (2):165–181 (1984)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
The limits of abstraction.Kit Fine - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Matthias Schirn.
A general theory of abstraction operators.Neil Tennant - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):105-133.
Transworld depravity, transworld sanctity, & uncooperative essences.Alvin Plantinga - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (1):178-191.
Abstraction in computer science.Timothy Colburn & Gary Shute - 2007 - Minds and Machines 17 (2):169-184.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
27 (#576,320)
6 months
5 (#638,139)
2009-01-28
Downloads
27 (#576,320)
6 months
5 (#638,139)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Good Guesses.Kevin Dorst & Matthew Mandelkern - 2023 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 105 (3):581-618.
Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory.Keith E. Stanovich - 2009 - In Keith Frankish & Jonathan St B. T. Evans (eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press. pp. 55--88.
Can evolution get us off the hook? Evaluating the ecological defence of human rationality.Maarten Boudry, Michael Vlerick & Ryan McKay - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 33:524-535.
Source Reliability and the Conjunction Fallacy.Andreas Jarvstad & Ulrike Hahn - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (4):682-711.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo