The Duhemian Argument

Philosophy of Science 27 (1):75 - 87 (1960)
This paper offers a refutation of P. Duhem's thesis that the falsifiability of an isolated empirical hypothesis H as an explanans is unavoidably inconclusive. Its central contentions are the following: 1. No general features of the logic of falsifiability can assure, for every isolated empirical hypothesis H and independently of the domain to which it pertains, that H can always be preserved as an explanans of any empirical findings O whatever by some modification of the auxiliary assumptions A in conjunction with which H functions as an explanans. For Duhem cannot guarantee on any general logical grounds the deducibility of O from an explanans constituted by the conjunction of H and some revised non-trivial version R of A: the existence of the required set R of collateral assumptions must be demonstrated for each particular case. 2. The categorical form of the Duhemian thesis is not only a non-sequitur but actually false. This is shown by adducing the testing of physical geometry as a counterexample to Duhem in the form of a rebuttal to A. Einstein's geometrical articulation of Duhem's thesis. 3. The possibility of a quasi a priori choice of a physical geometry in the sense of Duhem must be clearly distinguished from the feasibility of a conventional adoption of such a geometry in the sense of H. Poincare. And the legitimacy of the latter cannot be invoked to save the Duhemian thesis from refutation by the foregoing considerations
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/185307
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,658
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Imre Lakatos (1974). The Role of Crucial Experiments in Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 4 (4):309-325.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Laurens Laudan (1965). Grünbaum on "the Duhemian Argument". Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):295-299.
Adolf Grünbaum (1960). The Duhemian Argument. Philosophy of Science 27 (1):75-87.
Philip L. Quinn (1969). The Status of the D-Thesis. Philosophy of Science 36 (4):381-399.
A. David Kline (1988). On the Intertheoretic Competition Hypothesis. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:33 - 40.
R. M. Yoshida (1975). Five Duhemian Theses. Philosophy of Science 42 (1):29-45.
Don Howard (1990). Einstein and Duhem. Synthese 83 (3):363 - 384.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

16 ( #165,587 of 1,725,950 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,693 of 1,725,950 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.