Foundations of Science 4 (2):115-132 (1999)
|Abstract||In this paper we concentrate on the nature of the liar paradox asa cognitive entity; a consistently testable configuration of properties. We elaborate further on a quantum mechanical model (Aerts, Broekaert and Smets, 1999) that has been proposed to analyze the dynamics involved, and we focus on the interpretation and concomitant philosophical picture. Some conclusions we draw from our model favor an effective realistic interpretation of cognitive reality.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bradley Dowden, Liar Paradox. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Dale Jacquette (2007). Denying The Liar. Polish Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):91-98.
Diederik Aerts, Ellie D'Hondt & Liane Gabora (2000). Why the Disjunction in Quantum Logic is Not Classical. .
Jeff Snapper (2012). The Liar Paradox in New Clothes. Analysis 72 (2):319-322.
Richard Kenneth Atkins (2011). This Proposition is Not True: C.S. Peirce and the Liar Paradox. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (4):421-444.
William Mark Stuckey, Michael Silbserstein & Michael Cifone, Reconciling Spacetime and the Quantum: Relational Blockworld and the Quantum Liar Paradox.
Jan Broekaert, Diederik Aerts & Bart D.’Hooghe (2006). The Generalised Liar Paradox: A Quantum Model and Interpretation. Foundations of Science 11 (4).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #37,849 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?