Graduate studies at Western
Religious Studies 43 (4):443-455 (2007)
|Abstract||This article responds to one of Thaddeus Metz's criticisms of the theory that the meaning of life is to fulfil a purpose assigned by God. In particular, it addresses the argument that only an atemporal God could ground meaning but that an atemporal God could not assign a purpose. In order to do this, the article first argues that Metz's criticisms misread the relevant sense of purpose. It then argues that on a more plausible reading of 'purpose', we can see that it is in fact the kind of thing that an atemporal God could assign|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thaddeus Metz (2007). God's Purpose as Irrelevant to Life's Meaning: Reply to Affolter. Religious Studies 43 (4):457-464.
Gordon Knight (1997). Universalism and the Greater Good. Faith and Philosophy 14 (1):98-103.
Kevin Timpe (2007). Truth-Making and Divine Eternity. Religious Studies 43 (3):299 - 315.
Nancy Hudson (2004). Theosis. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (3):387-397.
Edgar Sheffield Brightman (1940/1969). A Philosophy of Religion. New York, Greenwood Press.
Thaddeus Metz (2000). Could God's Purpose Be the Source of Life's Meaning? Religious Studies 36 (3):293-313.
Jonathan D. Jacobs (2009). An Eastern Orthodox Conception of Theosis and Human Nature. Faith and Philosophy 26 (5):615-627.
Stephen Palmquist (2008). Kant's Moral Panentheism. Philosophia 36 (1):17-28.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads66 ( #16,597 of 739,336 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,322 of 739,336 )
How can I increase my downloads?