Utilitarian Theories Reconsidered: Common Misconceptions, More Recent Developments, and Health Policy Implications
Graduate studies at Western
Health Care Analysis 11 (3):229-244 (2003)
|Abstract||Despite the prevalence of the terms utilitarianism and utilitarian in the health care and health policy literature, anecdotal evidence suggests that authors are often not fully aware of the diversity of utilitarian theories, their principles, and implications. Further, it seems that authors often categorically reject utilitarianism under the assumption that it violates individual rights. The tendency of act utilitarianism to neglect individual rights is attenuated, however, by the diminishing marginal utility of wealth and the disutility of a protest by those who are disadvantaged. In practice, act utilitarians tend to introduce moral rules and preserve traditional rules. At the same time, the tenability of rule utilitarianism is limited because it ultimately collapses into act utilitarianism or a deontological theory. Negative utilitarianism is a viable utilitarian variant only if we accept complete aversion to suffering, ie, if we disregard any forgone opportunities to increase pleasure. Finally, the adoption of preference utilitarianism requires us to accept the subjectivity of individual claims which may be perceived as unfair|
|Keywords||act utilitarianism deontological theory negative utilitarianism preference utilitarianism resource allocation in health care rule utilitarianism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Daniel Hunter (1994). Act Utilitarianism and Dynamic Deliberation. Erkenntnis 41 (1):1 - 35.
Gerald Lang (2004). A Dilemma for Objective Act-Utilitarianism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):221-239.
T. L. S. Sprigge (1965). A Utilitarian Reply to Dr. McCloskey. Inquiry 8 (1-4):264 – 291.
Lincoln Allison (ed.) (1990). The Utilitarian Response: The Contemporary Viability of Utilitarian Political Philosophy. Sage Publications.
F. Neil Brady (1985). A Defense of Utilitarian Policy Processes in Corporate and Public Management. Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):23 - 30.
Bernward Gesang (2013). What Climate Policy Can a Utilitarian Justify? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (2):377-392.
Donald Regan (1980). Utilitarianism and Co-Operation. Oxford University Press.
Tim Mulgan (2012). The Future of Utilitarianism. In James Maclaurin (ed.), Rationis Defensor.
Tim Mulgan (2012). The Future of Utilitarianism. In Rationis Defensor.
Conrad D. Johnson (1991). Moral Legislation: A Legal-Political Model for Indirect Consequentialist Reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
Clay Splawn (2001). “The Self-Other Asymmetry and Act Utilitarianism.”. Utilitas 13 (3):323-333.
John C. Harsanyi (1977). Rule Utilitarianism and Decision Theory. Erkenntnis 11 (1):25 - 53.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads16 ( #81,761 of 727,488 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 727,488 )
How can I increase my downloads?