False prophecy versus true Quest a modest challenge to contemporary relativists
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22 (3):285-312 (1992)
| Abstract | A good theory of rationality should accommodate debates over first principles, such as those of rationality. The modest challenge made in this article is that relativists try to explain the (intellectual) value of some debates about first principles (absolute presuppositions, basic assumptions, intellectual frameworks, intellectual commitments, and paradigms). Relativists claim to justify moving with relative ease from one framework to another, translating chunks of one into the other; this technique is essential for historians, anthropologists and others. Thus ideas concerning false prophecy are transferable to contemporary discussions. Ancient false prophets offered illusions of overcoming difficult problems cheaply; relativists do that too. The problem that relativism purports to solve cheaply is that of legitimizing pluralism. As the absolutist theory of truth is intuitively problematic, relativism seems intuitively more acceptable, but this intuitive advantage vanishes when it manifests as false prophecy. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJay Garfield (2009). Mmountains Are Just Mountains. In Mario D'Amato, Jay L. Garfield & Tom J. F. Tillemans (eds.), Pointing at the Moon: Buddhism, Logic, Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Max Kölbel (2004). Indexical Telativism Versus Genuine Relativism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (3):297-313.
Max Kölbel (2004). Indexical Telativism Versus Genuine Relativism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (3):297-313.
Max Kölbel (2004). Indexical Telativism Versus Genuine Relativism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (3):297-313.
Harold Zellner (1995). “Is Relativism Self-Defeating?”. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:287-295.
Max Kölbel (2004). Indexical Relativism Versus Genuine Relativism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (3):297 – 313.
Mikhail Kissine (2012). From Contexts to Circumstances of Evaluation: Is the Trade-Off Always Innocuous? Synthese 184 (2):199-216.
Steven D. Hales (1997). A Consistent Relativism. Mind 106 (421):33-52.
Herman Cappelen (2008). Content Relativism and Semantic Blindness. In G. Carpintero & M. Koelbel (eds.), Relative Truth. Oxford University Press.
Timothy Williamson (2005). Knowledge, Context, and the Agent's Point of View. In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #114,063 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,333 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
