Heidegger made simple (and offensive)
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (3):423-431 (2004)
| Abstract | presents Heidegger as a devout mystic who viewed the Nazi Party as the sacred vessel of a divine message—even though, the author adds, his religion is secular and so it has no divinity and no immortal soul. Rickey sees him as a utopian. This makes some sense: the unique in the Shoah involves the unique descent of a highly cultured, enlightened nation to the rock bottom of barbarism. Ricky’s text belies his effort to exonerate Heidegger. Key Words: Rickey • Heidegger • secular religion • barbarism. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFrank Schalow (2008). Essence and Ape. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (3):445-462.
Joanna Hodge (1995). Heidegger and Ethics. Routledge.
Andrew J. Mitchell (2005). Heidegger and Terrorism. Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):181-218.
Bret W. Davis (2007). Heidegger and the Will: On the Way to Gelassenheit. Northwestern University Press.
David Wood (2002). Thinking After Heidegger. Blackwell Publishers.
Benjamin D. Crowe (2007). Heidegger's Gods. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (2):225 – 245.
Hubert L. Dreyus & Charles Spinosa (1997). Highway Bridges and Feasts: Heidegger and Borgmann on How to Affirm Technology. Man and World 30 (2):159-178.
Mark Wildschut (2005). Heidegger Into D(E)Ut(s)Ch. Studia Phaenomenologica 5:53-67.
James E. Faulconer & Mark A. Wrathall (eds.) (2000). Appropriating Heidegger. Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads76 ( #10,629 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,251 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
