How to Investigate the Grammar of Aspect- Perception: A Question in Wittgensteinian Method

Essays in Philosophy 13 (1):85-105 (2012)
I argue that the typical Wittgensteinian method of philosophical investigation cannot help elucidate the grammar of aspect-seeing. In the typical Wittgensteinian method, we examine meaning in use: We practice language, and note the logical ramifications. I argue that the effectiveness of this method is hindered in the case of aspect-seeing by the fact that aspect-seeing involves an aberrant activity of seeing: Whereas it is normally nonsense to say that we choose what to see (decide to see the White House red, for instance), it is possible to see aspects at will—e.g. to decide to see Jastrow’s duck-rabbit as a duck. I suggest an alternative method of investigation, one that reflects on language from a disengaged standpoint: a method that allows us to entertain a form of conceptualization of an object but does not commit us to adopting that way—namely, that does not involve us in a use of the object according to the norms that govern that conceptualization. This method, I argue, fits the s ubject matter of aspect-perception, since aspect-perception itself involves such a disengaged form of reflection.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,631
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
George J. Agich (2001). The Question of Method in Ethics Consultation. American Journal of Bioethics 1 (4):31 – 41.
S. Psillos (1996). Review. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):663-668.
Stathis Psillos (1994). Review. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (3):663-668.
Stathis Psillos (1996). Review. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):663-668.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

47 ( #96,017 of 1,938,807 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

9 ( #62,638 of 1,938,807 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.