David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Essays in Philosophy 13 (1):85-105 (2012)
I argue that the typical Wittgensteinian method of philosophical investigation cannot help elucidate the grammar of aspect-seeing. In the typical Wittgensteinian method, we examine meaning in use: We practice language, and note the logical ramifications. I argue that the effectiveness of this method is hindered in the case of aspect-seeing by the fact that aspect-seeing involves an aberrant activity of seeing: Whereas it is normally nonsense to say that we choose what to see (decide to see the White House red, for instance), it is possible to see aspects at will—e.g. to decide to see Jastrow’s duck-rabbit as a duck. I suggest an alternative method of investigation, one that reflects on language from a disengaged standpoint: a method that allows us to entertain a form of conceptualization of an object but does not commit us to adopting that way—namely, that does not involve us in a use of the object according to the norms that govern that conceptualization. This method, I argue, fits the s ubject matter of aspect-perception, since aspect-perception itself involves such a disengaged form of reflection.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Reshef Agam-Segal (2012). Reﬂecting on Language From “Sideways-On”: Preparatory and Non-Preparatory Aspects-Seeing. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 1 (6).
Wendy Lynn Clark & J. M. Fritzman (2002). Reducing Spirit to Substance. Idealistic Studies 32 (2):73-100.
George J. Agich (2001). The Question of Method in Ethics Consultation. American Journal of Bioethics 1 (4):31 – 41.
Byong-Chul Park (1998). Wittgenstein's Use of the Word 'Aspekt'. Synthese 115 (1):131-140.
Gloria Ayob (2009). The Aspect-Perception Passages: A Critical Investigation of Köhler's Isomorphism Principle. Philosophical Investigations 32 (3):264-280.
Charles M. Myers (1962). Perceptual Events, States, and Processes. Philosophy of Science 29 (July):285-291.
G. Neville Kemp (1991). Metaphor and Aspect-Perception. Analysis (March) 84 (March):84-90.
Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2004). Some Epistemological Consequences of The Dual-Aspect Theory of Visual Perception. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):273-290.
S. Psillos (1996). Review. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):663-668.
Stathis Psillos (1994). Review. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (3):663-668.
Stathis Psillos (1996). Review. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):663-668.
Duncan Richter (2001). Missing the Entire Point: Wittgenstein and Religion. Religious Studies 37 (2):161-175.
Fiona Ellis (2001). On the Dismounting of Seesaws. Philosophy 76 (1):31-54.
Added to index2012-11-11
Total downloads9 ( #163,661 of 1,100,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #90,386 of 1,100,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?