Turner on Merton

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (2):284-293 (2009)
Stephen Turner complains about weaknesses of Robert K. Merton's teachings without noticing that these are common. He puts down Merton's ideas despite his innovations, on the ground that they are not successful and not sufficiently revolutionary. The criteria by which he condemns Merton are too vague and too high. Merton's merit is in his having put the sociology of science on the map and drawn attention to the egalitarianism that was prominent in classical science and that is now diminished. Key Words: American sociology • intellectual frameworks • Merton • middle axioms • time lag.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0048393109332134
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,316
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Harold Kincaid (2009). A More Sophisticated Merton. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (2):266-271.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

27 ( #176,516 of 1,926,182 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #93,408 of 1,926,182 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.