A Critical Comment on Collste

Public Health Ethics 4 (2):203-205 (2011)
Abstract
This article claims that the account of specification as a way to solve conflicts between rights, suggested by Göran Collste, is unsatisfactory. It is argued that specification is not a solution on its own, but is better described as a remedy in response to a political failure
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,365
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
G. Collste (2011). A Reply to Agnafors. Public Health Ethics 4 (3):303-304.
Bruce Kuklick (2007). Comment on Campbell. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):382-385.
Alasdair Cochrane (2012). From Human Rights to Sentient Rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (5):655-675.
James Fishkin (2005). Defending Deliberation: A Comment on Ian Shapiro's The State of Democratic Theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (1):71-78.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-06-15

Total downloads

3 ( #224,207 of 1,089,100 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

0

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.