A Critical Comment on Collste

Public Health Ethics 4 (2):203-205 (2011)
This article claims that the account of specification as a way to solve conflicts between rights, suggested by Göran Collste, is unsatisfactory. It is argued that specification is not a solution on its own, but is better described as a remedy in response to a political failure
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/phe/phr015
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,974
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
G. Collste (2011). A Reply to Agnafors. Public Health Ethics 4 (3):303-304.
Bruce Kuklick (2007). Comment on Campbell. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):382-385.
Alasdair Cochrane (2012). From Human Rights to Sentient Rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (5):655-675.
James Fishkin (2005). Defending Deliberation: A Comment on Ian Shapiro's The State of Democratic Theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (1):71-78.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

6 ( #322,845 of 1,725,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,700 of 1,725,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.