Graduate studies at Western
Judgment and Decision Making 3 (4):344-354 (2008)
|Abstract||We perform an experimental investigation using a dictator game in which individuals must make a moral decision —to give or not to give an amount of money to poor people in the Third World. A questionnaire in which the subjects are asked about the reasons for their decision shows that, at least in this case, moral motivations carry a heavy weight in the decision: the majority of dictators give the money for reasons of a consequentialist nature. Based on the results presented here and of other analogous experiments, we conclude that dicator behavior can be understood in terms of moral distance rather than social distance and that it systematically deviates from the egoism assumption in economic models and game theory.|
|Keywords||dictator game moral distance experimental philosophy experimental economics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Roberto Festa (1986). A Measure for the Distance Between an Interval Hypothesis and the Truth. Synthese 67 (2):273 - 320.
Muhammad Maqsud (1982). Effects of Nigerian Children's Group Discussion on Their Moral Progression. Journal of Moral Education 11 (3):181-187.
Sharie McNamee (1977). Moral Behaviour, Moral Development and Motivation. Journal of Moral Education 7 (1):27-31.
Don Ross (2001). The Game-Theoretic Innocence of Experimental Behavioral Psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):426-427.
Joseph Henrich, Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Colin Camerer, Ernst Fehr, Herbert Gintis, Richard McElreath, Michael Alvard, Abigail Barr, Jean Ensminger, Natalie Smith Henrich, Kim Hill, Francisco Gil-White, Michael Gurven, Frank W. Marlowe & John Q. Patton (2005). “Economic Man” in Cross-Cultural Perspective: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):795-815.
B. Verbeek (2002). Game Theory and Moral Norms. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):337-352.
John Cottingham (2000). Caring at a Distance: (Im)Partiality, Moral Motivation and the Ethics of Representation - Partiality, Distance and Moral Obligation. Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (3):309 – 313.
Miranda Fricker (2010). The Relativism of Blame and Williams's Relativism of Distance. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):151-177.
G. Mellema (2003). Responsibility, Taint, and Ethical Distance in Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 47 (2):125 - 132.
Fernando Aguiar, Pablo Brañas-Garza, Maria Paz Espinosa & Luis M. Miller (2010). Personal Identity: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (3):261-275.
Added to index2009-12-01
Total downloads55 ( #22,018 of 738,403 )
Recent downloads (6 months)26 ( #4,771 of 738,403 )
How can I increase my downloads?