The Concept of Art for Art's Sake
Philosophy 29 (108):44- (1954)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPeter Goldie (2007). Towards A Virtue Theory of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (4):372-387.
Meter Amevans (1975). Art for Art's Sake Again? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 33 (3):303-307.
Van Meter Ames (1975). Art for Art's Sake Again? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 33 (3):303 - 307.
Richard Shusterman (1984). Aesthetic Censorship: Censoring Art for Art's Sake. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43 (2):171-180.
Donald B. Kuspit (1968). Dewey's Critique of Art for Art's Sake. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 27 (1):93-98.
Casey Haskins (1990). Kant, Autonomy, and Art for Art's Sake. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48 (3):235-237.
Nicholas Stang (2012). Artworks Are Not Valuable for Their Own Sake. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (3):271-280.
Christy Mag Uidhir & P. D. Magnus (2011). Art Concept Pluralism. Metaphilosophy 42 (1-2):83-97.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads9 ( #114,063 of 549,084 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,084 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
