Review of Robert B. Talisse, Democracy and Moral Conflict (Cambridge UP, 2009) [Book Review]

Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):666-668 (2011)
The review argues that Talisse's epistemic defense of democracy in his "Democracy and Moral Conflict," albeit novel and interesting, falls prey to an epistemic analogue of the problem of reasonable moral pluralism that Rawls famously posed for moral justifications of democracy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.710_15.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,865
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Andrew Lister (2011). Democracy and Moral Conflict. Social Theory and Practice 37 (2):363-370.
Thom Brooks (2009). A Critique of Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 50-54.
Shane Ralston (2009). Deweyan Democracy and Pluralism. Social Philosophy Today 25:223-240.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

41 ( #80,616 of 1,724,951 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #210,935 of 1,724,951 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.