Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 43 (1-2):89 - 102 (2003)
|Abstract||Business relations rely on shared perceptions of what is acceptable/expected norms of behavior. Immense expansion in transnational business made rudimentary consensus on acceptable business practices across cultural boundaries particularly important. Nonetheless, as more and more nations with different cultural and historical experiences interact in the global economy, the potential for misunderstandings based on different expectations is magnified. Such misunderstandings emerge in a growing literature on "improper" business practices – articulated from a narrow cultural perspective. This paper reports an ongoing research on the cultural and contextual aspects of business ethics. The objective is to investigate how the perception/attitudes of business students towards the ethical dimension of doing business varies in different countries; Whether there are socio-cultural factors that influence the perception of ethicality in business practices. Research findings among business students in six countries: China, Egypt, Finland, Korea, Russia, and the U.S.A. are reported. While all groups had basic agreement on what constitutes ethical business practices, differences are found in the respondents'' tolerance to damage resulting from "unethical" behavior. Without underestimating the role of national culture, variations in research results also point to the importance of current socio-political developments in the relevant countries. Implications for business teaching and management development are discussed|
|Keywords||business ethics business education China economies in transition Egypt Finland Republic of Korea Russia U.S.A|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marilyn Okleshen & Richard Hoyt (1996). A Cross Cultural Comparison of Ethical Perspectives and Decision Approaches of Business Students: United States of America Versus New Zealand. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 15 (5):537 - 549.
Kazi Firoz Alam (1995). Attitudes Towards Business Ethics of Business Students in Malaysia. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (4):309 - 313.
Leni Grünbaum (1997). Attitudes of Future Managers Towards Business Ethics: A Comparison of Finnish and American Business Students. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (4):451-463.
P. Maria Joseph Christie, Ik-Whan G. Kwon, Philipp A. Stoeberl & Raymond Baumhart (2003). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Ethical Attitudes of Business Managers: India Korea and the United States. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 46 (3):263 - 287.
A. Peterson Robert, Dwight Merunka Gerald Albaum, Scott Jose Luis Munuera & M. Smith (forthcoming). Effects of Nationality, Gender, and Religiosity on Business-Related Ethicality. Journal of Business Ethics.
Soheila Mirshekary & Ann D. K. Lawrence (2009). Academic and Business Ethical Misconduct and Cultural Values: A Cross National Comparison. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (3):141-157.
Thomas W. Whipple & Dominic F. Swords (1992). Business Ethics Judgments: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 11 (9):671 - 678.
Dean E. Allmon, Henry C. K. Chen, Thomas K. Pritchett & Pj Forrest (1997). A Multicultural Examination of Business Ethics Perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (2):183-188.
Kun Young Chung, John W. Eichenseher & Teruso Taniguchi (2008). Ethical Perceptions of Business Students: Differences Between East Asia and the USA and Among "Confucian" Cultures. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 79 (1/2):121 - 132.
Paul Dunn & Anamitra Shome (2009). Cultural Crossvergence and Social Desirability Bias: Ethical Evaluations by Chinese and Canadian Business Students. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4):527 - 543.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #26,046 of 751,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,163 of 751,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?