Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (5):263-266 (1996)
|Abstract||OBJECTIVES: To compare the practices of local research ethics committees and the time they take to obtain ethical approval for a multi-centre study. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of outcome of applications for a multi-centre study to local research ethics committees. SETTING: Thirty-six local research ethics committees covering 38 district health authorities in England. MAIN MEASURES: Response of chairmen and women, the time required to obtain approval, and questions asked in application forms. RESULTS: We received replies from all 36 chairmen contacted: four (11%) granted their approval, and 32 (89%) required our proposal to be considered by their local research ethics committee. Three committees asked us to attend their meetings. The application was approved by all 36 local research ethics committees but the time to obtain ethical approval varied between six to 208 days. One third of the committees did not approve the project within three months, and three took longer than six months. There was considerable variation in the issues raised by local research ethics committees and none conformed exactly to the Royal College of Physicians' guidelines. CONCLUSION: Obtaining ethical approval for a multi-centre study is time-consuming. There is much diversity in the practice of local research ethics committees. Our data support the recommendation for a central or regional review body of multi-centre studies which will be acceptable to all local research ethics committees|
|Keywords||info:mesh/Retrospective Studies info:mesh/Multicenter Studies as Topic info:mesh/Ethics Committees info:mesh/Ethical Review info:mesh/Humans info:mesh/Ethics Committees, Research Humans Retrospective Studies Research Time Factors Ethical Review Ethics Committees Ethics Committees, Research England Multicenter Studies as Topic info:mesh/England info:mesh/Time Factors info:mesh/Research|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
C. J. Moerman, J. A. Haafkens, M. Soderstrom, E. Rasky, P. Maguire, U. Maschewsky-Schneider, M. Norstedt, D. Hahn, H. Reinerth & N. McKevitt (2007). Gender Equality in the Work of Local Research Ethics Committees in Europe: A Study of Practice in Five Countries. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (2):107-112.
David Hunter, Tis but a Scratch: The Human Tissue Act and the Use of Tissue for Research, Issues for Research Ethics Committees.
Paulina Tindana & Okyere Boateng (2008). The Ghana Experience. Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (4):277-281.
J. Berry (1997). Local Research Ethics Committees Can Audit Ethical Standards in Research. Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (6):379-381.
E. Pickworth (2000). Should Local Research Ethics Committees Monitor Research They Have Approved? Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (5):330-333.
Jon Glasby & Peter Beresford (2007). In Whose Interests? Local Research Ethics Committees and Service User Research. Ethics and Social Welfare 1 (3):282-292.
David Shaw (2011). The Ethics Committee as Ghost Author. Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (12):706-706.
A. Hedgecoe (2006). Research Ethics Committees in Europe: Implementing the Directive, Respecting Diversity. Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (8):483-486.
G. Kent (1999). Responses by Four Local Research Ethics Committees to Submitted Proposals. Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (3):274-277.
C. G. Foster, T. Marshall & P. Moodie (1995). The Annual Reports of Local Research Ethics Committees. Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (4):214-219.
Reidar Pedersen, Victoria Akre & Reidun Førde (2009). Barriers and Challenges in Clinical Ethics Consultations: The Experiences of Nine Clinical Ethics Committees. Bioethics 23 (8):460-469.
Jean-Claude Chevrolet & Bara Ricou (2009). Hospital Clinical Ethics Committees. The Geneva Experience - Switzerland. Diametros 22:21-38.
Lonneke M. Poort (2008). The Role of Ethics Committees in Public Debate. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):19-35.
E. Roche, R. King, H. M. Mohan, B. Gavin & F. McNicholas (2013). Payment of Research Participants: Current Practice and Policies of Irish Research Ethics Committees. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):591-593.
Ghaiaith Hussein (2008). The Sudan Experience. Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (4):289-293.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads1 ( #292,381 of 739,348 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?